[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 26, Issue 3 (7-2014) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2014, 26(3): 153-157 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Primary and Permanent Enamel Using Dentin bonding and Enamel Bonding Agents
Mehdi Shahrabi1 , Alireza Heidari * 2, Parvin Musavi Sahlan3
1- Associate Professor, Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran , ar-heidari@tums.ac.ir
3- Dentist
Abstract:   (8471 Views)

  Background and Aim : Dentin bonding agents are gradually replacing enamel bonding agents in the clinical setting. Considering the different properties of these two materials, their bonding strength to enamel may be different.

  The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of composite restorations to enamel using dentin bonding and enamel bonding agents .

  Materials and Methods : In this experimental study, buccal surfaces of 24 freshly extracted primary and permanent teeth were polished by the polishing papers in order to obtain a piece of flat enamel 3 mm in diameter. After etching, rinsing and drying the surfaces, the specimens were divided into 4 groups. Enamel bonding (Margin Bond) was applied to the surfaces of 6 primary and 6 permanent teeth and Single Bond was applied to the surfaces of the remaining teeth. All teeth were cured. Composite resin (3mm in diameter and 4 mm in height) was applied to the prepared surfaces. Then, the specimens were thermocycled for 2000 cycles and the shear bond strength was determined using an Instron universal testing machine. The findings were analyzed by SPSS and two-way ANOVA .

  Results: There was no significant difference in the mean shear bond strength of the two groups of primary and permanent teeth (p=0.518). Also, no significant difference was found between enamel and dentin bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth (p =0.17 ). 

  Conclusion : The shear bond strength of composite to enamel was not significantly different between the primary and permanent teeth following the use of enamel or dentin bonding agents .

Keywords: Enamel bonding agent, Dentin bonding agent, Shear bond strength, Enamel, Primary teeth, Permanent teeth
Full-Text [PDF 151 kb]   (2487 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Pediatric Dentistry
References
1. Roberson MT, Heymann OH, Swift JR. Art and science of operative dentistry. 5thed. USA: Mosby; 2006: Chap 5.
2. Soetopo N, Beech O, Hardwick J. Mechanism of adhesion of polymers to acid-etched enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 1978 Jan; 5(1):69-80.
3. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992 Jan; 23 (1):39-41.
4. Swift EJ Jr. Bonding systems for restorative ma-terials. A comprehensive review. Pediatr Dent. 1998 Mar-Apr; 20(2):80-84.
5. Pinkham JR. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy through Adolescence. 4thed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
6. Graig RG, Orbien WJ, Powers JM. Dental mate-rials, Properties and manipulation. 11thed.USA: The Mosby; 2002.
7. Walls AW, Leey MC, Cabe JF. The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel. Br Dent J. 2001 Aug; 191(3):148-50.
8. Hormati A, Fuller J, Denehy G. Effect of con-tamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent As-soc. 1980 Jan; 100(1):34-38.
9. Barghi N, Knight G, BerryT. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel. Oper Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug; 16(4):130-35.
10. Powers JM, Finer WJ, Xif J. Bonding of com-posite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Mar; 4(1):28-32.
11. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb; 25(1): 51-8.
12. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb; 25(1): 51-8.
13. Da Costa CC, Oshima HM, Costa Filho LC. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfa-cial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth. Gen Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb; 56 (1):85-93.
14. Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RH. Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Dec;18(6):591-8.
15. Mc leod ME, Price RB, Felix CM. Effect of configuration factor on shear bond strengths of self etch adhesive systems to ground enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2010, Jan-Feb; 35(1):84-93.
16. Kanca J 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quintessence Int. 1992 Sept; 23(9):625-7.
17. Wakefielo CW, Sneed WD, Draughn RA, Davis TN. Composite bonding to dentin and enamel: effect of humidity. Gen Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec; 44 (6):508-12.
18. Woronko GA Jr, St Germain HA Jr, Meiers JC. Effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent. 1996 May -Jun; 21(3):116-21.
19. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwat A, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin enamel interface crated by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jun; 29(6): 525-33.
20. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr. Bond strength of scotch bond multi-purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent. 1992 Dec; 5(6):318-20.
21. Yasini E, Malekan E. Comparison of shear bond strength between unfilled resin to dry enamel and dentin bonding to moist and dry enamel. J of Dentistry TUMS 2005 Spring; 18(1):15-20.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahrabi M, Heidari A, Musavi Sahlan P. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Primary and Permanent Enamel Using Dentin bonding and Enamel Bonding Agents . J Iran Dent Assoc 2014; 26 (3) :153-157
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1642-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 3 (7-2014) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645