[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 28, Issue 2 (4-2016) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2016, 28(2): 64-71 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Type of Surface Treatment and Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to a Non-Precious Metal Alloy
Esmaeil Yasini1 , Mansooreh Mirzaie2 , Hamid Kermanshah2 , Elahe Habibi3 , Fariba Motevasselian * 4
1- Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Specialist in Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, Tehran, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , f-motevasselian@sina.tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3897 Views)
Background and Aim: Fractured metal-ceramic restorations may be repaired with composite in some cases to postpone the fabrication of a new restoration. Knowledge about the bond strength can help predict the success rate of this treatment modality. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of two types of mechanical surface treatment of metal along with the use of different adhesive systems on bond strength of composite to a non-precious metal alloy.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 110 metal discs were fabricated of nickel chromium alloy and were randomly divided into two groups of surface preparation with sandblasting (S) and bur (B). In each group, the samples were divided into five subgroups based on the adhesive system and composite resin used: Group NC: Z350 composite without application of adhesive; group AC: Alloy primer/Clearfil AP-X; group ZA: Z-Prime Plus/Aelite; group MT: Monobond Plus/Tetric N Ceram; group AZ: Adper Single Bond Plus/Z250. In the positive control group (PC), metal discs were covered with feldspathic porcelain. All samples were then subjected to 1000 thermal cycles and shear bond strength was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (P<0.05).
Results: The interaction effect of type of surface treatment and type of adhesive system on bond strength was significant (P<0.05). The highest bond strength (148.7 MPa) was noted in group PC and the lowest bond strength (2.78 MPa) was noted in group B+NC. The bond strength was 13.72 MPa in group S+AZ, 10.84 MPa in group B+AZ and 12.72 MPa in group S+ZA, which did not have a significant difference with the bond strength of group PC.
Conclusion: Type of surface preparation and adhesive affect the bond strength. Surface preparation by sandblasting or bur combined with the use of Adper Single Bond Plus and also combination of Z-Prime Plus adhesive and sandblasting yielded the highest bond strength value.
 
Keywords: Dental Bonding, Adhesives, Shear Strength, Composite Resins, Metal Ceramic Alloys
Full-Text [PDF 367 kb]   (1946 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Gourav R, Ariga P, Jain AR, Philip JM. Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 May;16(3):208-12.
2. Ozcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to- metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Mar; 30 (3):265-69.
3. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT Jr. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31.
4. Ozcan M. Evaluation of alternative intra-oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jan; 30 (2):194-203.
5. dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Sept;96(3):165-73.
6. Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb; 83(2):181-6.
7. Jain S, Parkash H, Gupta S, Bhargava A. To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sept; 13(3):315-20.
8. Ozcan M. How to repair ceramic chipping or fracture in metal-ceramic fixed dental prosthe-ses intraorally step by step procedures. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Oct; 16(5):491-2.
9. Knight JS, Sneed WD, Wilson MC. Strengths of composite bonded to base metal alloy using dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Aug; 84 (2):149-53.
10. Haneda IG, Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Cruz CA, Adabo GL. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. Gen Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec; 57(6):644-51.
11. Yoo JY, Yoon HI, Park JM, Park EJ. Porcelain repair-Influence of different systems and sur-face treatments on resin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;7(5):343-8.
12. Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HW, de Rijk WG, Belser UC. Weibull parameters of compo-site resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater. 2002 July; 18(5):389-95.
13. Mohammadi N, Shakur Shahabi M, Kimyai S, Pournaghiazar F, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME. Shear Bond Strengths of methacrylate-and si-lorane-based composite resins to feldspathic porcelain using different adhesive systems. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Sum; 9(3):181-7.
14. Dantas DC, Ribeiro AI, Lima LH, de Lima MG, Guenes GM, Braz AK, et al. Influence of water storage time on the bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems. Braz Dent J. 2008; 19(3):219-23.
15. Mattiello RD, Coelho TM, Insaurralde E, Ka-life Coelho AA, Gustavo Pereira Terra GP, Kasuya AV, et al. A review of surface treatment methods to improve the adhesive cementation of zirconia-based ceramics. ISRN Biomaterials. 2013 August; 2013.
16. Sanohkan S, Kukiattrakoon B, Larpboonphol N, Sae-Yib T, Jampa T, Manoppan S. The ef-fect of various primers on shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic and resin composite. J Con-serv Dent. 2013 Nov;16(6):499-502.
17. Choo SS, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;7(5):392-9.
18. Heikkinen TT, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK, Lassi-la LVJ. Effect of Primers and Resins on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Zirconia. SRX Dentistry. 2010; 2010.
19. Sanohkan S, Kukiattrakoon B, Larpboonphol N, Sae-Yib T, Jampa T, Manoppan S. The effect of various primers on shear bond strength of zir-conia ceramic and resin composite. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Nov; 16(6):499-502.
20. Bonding to Zirconia, Alumina and Metal with Bisco Z-PRIME Plus: Creating Solutions to Clinical Challenges! Availa-ble at:https://www.dentalcompare.com/Featured-Articles/2113-Bonding-to-Zirconia-Alumina-and-Metal-with-Bisco-Z-PRIME-Plus Creating-Solutions-to-Clinical-Challenges/Accessed November 7, 2015.
21. 3M ESPE Adper™ Single Bond Plus Adhesive: technical product profile. Available at: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/274244O/adpertm-single-bond-plus-adhesive.pdf/Accessed November 7, 2015.
22. Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H, et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials. 2003 May;24(11):1861-7.
23. Tam LE, Khoshand S, Pilliar RM. Fracture re-sistance of dentin composite interfaces using different adhesives layers. J Dent. 2001 May; 29 (3):217-25.
24. Mitsui FH, Peris AR, Cavalcanti AN, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA. Influence of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strengths of total and self etching adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr; 31(2):240-7.
25. Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear bond strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy us-ing two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb; 83(2):181-6.
26. Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. J pros-thet Dent. 2013 Nov; 110(5):402-7.
27. Kalra A, Mohan MS, Gowda EM. Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelaim repair systems after different surface treatment. Con-temp Clin Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):196-200.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yasini E, Mirzaie M, Kermanshah H, Habibi E, Motevasselian F. Effect of Type of Surface Treatment and Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to a Non-Precious Metal Alloy. J Iran Dent Assoc 2016; 28 (2) :64-71
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1858-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 28, Issue 2 (4-2016) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645