[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 26, Issue 3 (7-2014) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2014, 26(3): 163-169 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Saliva Contamination on Shear Bond Strength of Transbond XT and Assure Universal Bonding Resin to Enamel
Gholamreza Eslami Amirabadi1 , Maryam Shirazi * 2, Zahra Shirazi3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontic, School of Dentistry, Shahed University. Tehran, Iran
2- Resident, Department of Orthodontic, School of Dentistry, Shahed University. Tehran, Iran , Dr.maryam_shirazi@yahoo.com
3- Dentist
Abstract:   (8168 Views)

  Background and Aim : Assure universal bonding resin is a modified cement with fluoride releasing property. It is claimed to provide adequate bond strength between the bracket and enamel in wet conditions although more studies are required in this regard. This study compared the shear bond strength of Transbond XT and Assure universal bonding resin to dry and saliva-contaminated enamel in vitro .

  Materials and Methods : In this in vitro study, 60 extracted human premolars were selected and stainless steel brackets were bonded to enamel surfaces. Bonding of brackets to enamel surfaces was done using Assure universal bonding resin (dry condition), Transbond XT (dry condition) and Assure (saliva-contaminated condition). The shear bond strength of brackets to the enamel was determined by Zwick/Roell machine in three groups. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Kruskal Wallis test .

  Results : The mean shear bond strength of brackets to enamel surfaces bonded with Assure (dry condition), Transbond XT and Assure (saliva-contaminated condition) was 14.18±4.78 MPa, 16.13±5.49 MPa and 13.32±4.74 MPa, respectively (with no significant differences). Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test found no significant differences regarding the adhesive remnant index (ARI).(p=0.053). .

  Conclusion : Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel surfaces with Assure universal bonding resin provided adequate bond strength in dry and saliva-contaminated conditions. Thus, it may be used for bonding of orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces in the clinical setting .

Keywords: Shear strength, Orthodontic adhesive, Dental enamel
Full-Text [PDF 815 kb]   (2974 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Orthodontics
References
1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955 Dec;34(6):849-53.
2. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobson JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998. Jul;114(1):80-7.
3. Chadwick SM, Gordon PH. An investigation into the fluoride release of a variety of ortho-dontic bonding agents. Br J Orthod. 1995 Feb;22(1):29-33.
4. Forsten L. Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro. Scand J Dent Res. 1990 Apr;98(2):179-85.
5. Takahashi K, Emilson CG, Birkhed D. Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer ce-ments and resin composites after exposure to NaF solutions. Dent Mater. 1993 Nov;9(6):350-4.
6. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Aug;106(2):127-30.
7. Fajen VB, Duncan MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Angolkar PV. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Apr; 97(4):316-22.
8. Ewoldsen N, Beatty MW, Erickson L, Feely D. Effects of enamel conditioning on bond strength with a restorative light-cured glass ion-omer. J Clin Orthod. 1995 Oct;29(10):621-4.
9. Meehan PM, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop. 1999 Feb;115(2):125-32.
10. Lippitz SJ, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):620-4.
11. CacciafestaV, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Su Benberger U, Miethke RR. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7.
12. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):243-9.
13. Ashcraft DB, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. Fluoride release and shear bond strengths of three light-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Mar; 111(3):260-5.
14. Zeppieri IL, Chung C-H, Mante FK. Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):414-9.
15. Schaneveldt S, Foley TF. Bond strength com-parison of moisture-insensitive primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Sept;122(3):267-73.
16. Rajapodal R, Padmanabhan S, Gnanamani J. A com-parison of shear bond strength and debonding char-acteristics of conventional, moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):264-8.
17. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C. An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding. Eur J Orthod. 2007 Sep; 29(6):559-563.
18. Turgut MD, Attar N, Korkmaz Y, Gokcelik A. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable composites. Dent Mater J. 2011 Jan;30(1):66-71.
19. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini ME, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and sali-va contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydro-philic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jun; 123(6):633-40.
20. Kula KS, Nash TD, Purk JH. Shear-peel bond strength of orthodontic primers in wet condi-tions. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2003 May;6(2):96-100.
21. Nemeth BR, Witahire WA, Levete CL. Shear/peel bond strength of orthodontic attachments to moist and dry enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):396-401.
22. Sirirungrojying S, Saito K, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Efficacy of using self-etching primer with a 4-Meta/MMA-TBB resin cement in bonding or-thodontic brackets to human enamel and effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength. Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):251-8.
23. Oztoprak MO, Isik F, Sayinsu K, Arun T, Ay-demir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamina-tion on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives. Am J Othod Dentofacial Or-thop. 2007 Feb;131(2):238-42.
24. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and light-cure adhesive. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):391-4.
25. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini M, DeAngelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and sali-va contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydro-philic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jun; 123(6):633-40.
26. Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Cakmak F, Ozkalayci N. Saliva contamination effect on shear bond strength of self-etching primer with different debond times. Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep; 77(5):901-906.
27. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: Composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42.
28. Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG JR, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan; 119(1):54-8.
29. Santos BM, Pithon MM, Ruellas AC, Sant'Anna EF. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded with hydrophilic and hydrophobic bond sys-tems under contamination. Angle Orthod. 2010 Sept; 80 (5):963-7.
30. Saito K, Sirirungrojying S, Meguro D, Hayaka-wa T, Kasai K. Bonding durability of using self-etching primer with 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement to bond orthodontic brackets. Angle Or-thod. 2005 Mar;75(2):260-5.
31. Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Apr;109(4):420-30.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Eslami Amirabadi G, Shirazi M, Shirazi Z. Effect of Saliva Contamination on Shear Bond Strength of Transbond XT and Assure Universal Bonding Resin to Enamel. J Iran Dent Assoc 2014; 26 (3) :163-169
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1644-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 3 (7-2014) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660