[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 28, Issue 1 (1-2016) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2016, 28(1): 34-39 Back to browse issues page
Stress Distribution in Natural Tooth and Implant Supported Removable Partial Denture with Different Attachment Types: A Photoelastic Analysis
Majid Naser Khaki1 , Arash Shishehian * 2
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran , pashrs2@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3178 Views)

Background and Aim: Different attachment designs have been developed to connect implant to natural teeth in partial dentures; however, adequate studies have not been performed to determine stress distribution patterns in these designs. The present study aimed to assess stress distribution patterns in natural tooth and implant supported removable partial denture with different attachment designs using photoelastic analysis.

Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, a photoelastic model of a partially edentulous mandible was fabricated and two Ankylosis implants were inserted at the site of first molar teeth bilaterally. Implants and teeth were connected by a partial denture and the acrylic base and implants were connected using ball and telescopic crown attachment types. Two crowns, one with resilient and the other one with rigid at-tachment were fabricated on the abutment teeth. Separate frameworks were designed and removable partial dentures were fabricated. Next, 100 N load was applied vertically to the area between implant and tooth. The pattern of stress distribution in implant in use of different implant-tooth attachment designs was studied by means of photoelastic method.

Results: The lowest stress concentration was noted in use of resilient attachment while rigid attachment showed the highest level of stress concentration.

Conclusion: Resilient attachment between implant and tooth created minimum stress concentration in implant; however, removable partial dentures were slightly instable in use of this attachment type. The decision to use different implant-tooth attachment types must be made based on clinical conditions.

Keywords: Denture, Partial, Removable, Dental Stress Analysis, Dental Implants
Full-Text [PDF 505 kb]   (1604 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Prosthodontics
References
1. Campbell RL. A comparative study of the resorption of the alveolar ridges in denture-weares and non-denture-wearers. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960; Feb(60):143-153.
2. Cho HW. Load transfer by distal extension RPD with implant-assisted support. J Dent Res. 2002; Mar; Issue 1_suppl A:A-156.
3. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issues in bone mechan-ics related to oral implants. Implant Dent. 1992 Winter; 1(4):289-294.
4. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Sep; 3(3): 104-11.
5. Naert I, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Dec; 68 (6):949-56.
6. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Influence of restoration type on stress distribu-tion in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Jan-Feb;13(1):82-90.
7. El-Sheikh AM, Hobkirk JA. Force transmission in bar-retained implant-stabilized mandibular overdentures: an in-vitro study. Eur J Prostho-dont Restor Dent. 2002 Dec;10(4):173-8.
8. Cho GC, Chee WW. Apparent intrusion of natural teeth under an implant-supported prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jul;68(1):3-5.
9. Chee WW, Cho GC. A rationale for not connecting implants to natural teeth. J Prostho-dont. 1997 Mar; 6(1):7-10.
10. Olsson M, Gunne J, Astrand P, Borg K. Bridges supported by free-standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five – year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Jun; 6(2):114-21.
11. Ericsson I, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Lindhe J, Glantz PO, Nyman S. A Clinical evolution of fixed-bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated titani-um implants. J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Apr;13(4):307-12.
12. Mijiritsky E, Ben Ur Z, Shershevsky A, Brosh T. Mechanical behavior of major connectors. Part 2: Influence of denture teeth height and loading direction. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2007 Apr;24(2):27-31.
13. Hindels GW. Load distribution in extension saddle partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Apr; 85(4):324-329.
14. Igarashi Y, Ogata A, Kuroiwa A, Wang CH. Stress distribution and abutment tooth mobility of distal-extension removable partial dentures with different retainers: an in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Feb;26(2):111-116.
15. Hoffmann O, Zafiropoulos GG. Tooth-implant connection: A review. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Apr; 38(2):194-200.
16. Daas M, Dubois G, Bonnet AS, Lipinski P, Ri-gnon-Bret C. A complete finite element model of mandibular implant retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations. Med Eng Phys. 2008 Mar; 30(2):218-225.
17. Carpenter JF. Implant-assisted unilateral removable partial dentures. Dent Today. 2014 Jan; 33(1):106-108.
18. Bambara GE. The attachment-retained overdenture. N Y State Dent J. 2004 Dec;70(9):30-3.
19. Maezawa N, Shiota M, Kasugai S, Wakabayashi N. Three-dimensional stress anal-ysis of tooth/implant. Retained long-span fixed dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct; 22 (5):710-8.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Naser Khaki M, Shishehian A. Stress Distribution in Natural Tooth and Implant Supported Removable Partial Denture with Different Attachment Types: A Photoelastic Analysis . J Iran Dent Assoc 2016; 28 (1) :34-39
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1840-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 28, Issue 1 (1-2016) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645