:: Volume 23, Issue 3 (Foll Text in Persian 2011) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2011, 23(3): 171-176 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of glaze or polish on dental porcelain`s surface roughness
Gholamreza Esfahanizadeh , Mohammad hasan Salari , Ezatolah Jalalian * 1, Omid Bangipour , Faranak Jalalian , Mahshad Allameh , Pardis Rezvanipour
1- , Dr_E_Jalalian@Yahoo.com
Abstract:   (16416 Views)

  Comparison of glaze or polish on dental porcelain`s surface roughness

  

  Dr. Esfahanizadeh GR.,1 Dr. Salari MH .,1 Dr. Jalalian E., 2 Dr. Bangipour O.,3 Dr. Jalalian F., 4

  Dr. Allameh M.,5 Dr. Rezvanipour P.5

  

  1 Assistant Professor , Department of Fixed Prosthodontic Dentistry , School of Dentistry, Tehran Islamic Azad University. Tehran, Iran . 2 Associate Professor , Department of Fixed Prosthodontic Dentistry , School of Dentistry, Tehran Islamic Azad University. Tehran, Iran . 3 Dentist. 4 Resident, Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan, Iran. 5 Student, Dentistry Department , Tehran Islamic Azad University. Tehran, Iran .

  

  (Received 13 March, 2010 Accepted 15 June, 2011)

  

  Abstract

  

  Background and Aim : Surface roughness of dental restorations can reduce the biological properties and wear the opposite. The goal of this investigation was comparing these process effects on the surface roughness of porcelain.

  Materials and Methods : In this experimental study, 20 Noritake porcelain disks of 1 cm diameter and 2-2.5 mm thickness with non-percious metal base were fabricated. All samples were finished with medium grit silicone disk and then randomly divided into four groups (n=5). In the first group, the samples were self glazed. In the second group, the samples were polished (EVE Polisher Kit). In the third group, after self glazing with a coarse grit stone, the self glaze layer was omitted, then reglazed. The fourth group was similar to the third group, but in the end stage a polishing kit was used. Samples were evaluated with Profilometer and then with SEM. As a result of normal distribution of the data, One-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis. The mean roughness for the glazed group was 1.06±0.0547 the polished group, 0.92±0.1304 the reglazed group, 1.22±1304 and the polished after glaze group 1.14±0.1342.

  Results: The polished and polished after glaze groups had a round shape in 100%, but the glazed and reglazed groups had a sharp shape in 60%.

  Conclusion : The polished surface is less rough compared to the glazed surface and in the polish after glaze group, the surface of the porcelain is less rough compared to the reglaze group.

  

 Key words: Surface roughness – Glaze – Polish – Dental porcelain

  

  Corresponding Author: Dr. Jalalian E ., Associate Professor , Department of Fixed Prosthodontic Dentistry , School of Dentistry, Tehran Islamic Azad University. Tehran, Iran .

  e.mail: Dr_E_Jalalian@Yahoo.com

Keywords: Surface roughness, Glaze, Polish, Dental porcelain
Full-Text [PDF 385 kb]   (2489 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Prosthodontics


XML     Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 3 (Foll Text in Persian 2011) Back to browse issues page