[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 27, Issue 1 (1-2015) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2015, 27(1): 58-63 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Generations of Resin Bonding Agents and Glass Ionomer to Dentin
Mohammad Atefat1 , Mostafa Sadeghi * 2
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Rafsanjan, Iran , mostafa.sadegh@rumsi.ac.ir
Abstract:   (5340 Views)

Background and Aim: Due to specific properties of dentin, such as tubular structure and intrinsic moisture, bond to dentin is more difficult than to enamel. The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin to dentin using three different types of resin bonding agents and a glass ionomer-based adhesive.

Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 72 premolar teeth without caries or resto-rations were selected and randomly divided into six groups of 12. The first group (I) was chosen as the control group and received no preparation of dentin surface. The remaining groups received application of Single Bond (group II), OptiBond XTR (group III), All-in-One (group IV) and GC Fuji Bond LC adhesive as pre-cure (group V) and co-cure (group VI) on dentin surface, respectively. The samples were stored for two weeks in water at room temperature and then their SBS was measured using Zwick universal testing ma-chine with a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Statistical data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2 test.

Results: The group bonded with OptiBond XTR had the maximum SBS (24.05±9.43 MPa) while the control group showed minimum SBS (0.68±0.32 MPa). SBS of composite resin to dentin in groups V and VI bonded with GC Fuji Bond LC adhesive was signifi-cantly lower than that in groups bonded with resin bonding agents (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Based on the results, application of GC Fuji Bond LC glass ionomer adhe-sive is not recommended to bond composite to dentin.

Keywords: Dentin bonding agent, Fuji bond LC, Glass ionomer, Composite resin
Full-Text [PDF 164 kb]   (2869 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955 Dec;34(6):849-53.
2. Chandler HH, Bowen RL, Paffenbarger GC, Mullineaux AL. Clinical investigation of a radiopaque composite restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970 Oct; 81(4):935-40.
3. Miguez PA, Castro PS, Nunes MF, Walter R, Pereira PN. Effect of acid-etching on the enam-el bond of two self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent. 2003 Summer;5(2):107-12.
4. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding systems. J Adhes Dent. 2000 Spring;2(1):57-65.
5. Goldstein RE. Is your spouse's smile aesthetic? Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003 Oct; 15(9):703.
6. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):177-83.
7. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992 Feb; 23(2): 135-41.
8. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug;3(4):133-8.
9. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J. 1968 Nov 5; 124(9):381-4.
10. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972 Feb; 15,132(4):133-5.
11. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res. 1991 Jan;70(1):72-4.
12. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hard-ness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993 Oct; 72(10):1434-42.
13. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhe-sives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005 Sept;21(9):864-81.
14. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years. Oper Dent. 2002 Sept-Oct; 27(5):438-41.
15. Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP, Bui HT, Mitra SB. In-hibition of dentin demineralization adjacent to a glass-ionomer/ composite sandwich restoration. Quintessence Int. 2009 Apr; 40(4):287-94.
16. Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volu-metric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater. 1998 Nov; 14(6):417-23.
17. Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bond-ing systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Sept; 25(9):666-71.
18. Neelima L, Sathish ES, Kandaswamy D; Bupesh. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of total-etch, self-etch, and glass iono-mer adhesive to human dentin: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2008 Apr-Jun; 19(2):129-33.
19. Satish G, Gopikrishna V, Ballal SN, Kandaswamy D, Mamatha Y. Evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of a total etch adhesive in comparison with a self-etching adhesive and a resin modified glass ionomer adhesive-An in-vitro fluorescent dye penetration test. J Conserv Dent. 2006 Dec; 9(2):55-62.
20. El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to den-tin: effect of smear layer thickness and differ-ent dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Dec;10(6):471-9.
21. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998 Sept-Oct; 23(5):244-9.
22. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, In-oue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and den-tin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35.
23. De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L, De Boever J. An 18-year retrospective survival study of full crowns with or without posts. Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr; 19 (2):136-42.
24. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thick-ness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):97-104.
25. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meer-beek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Fall;3(3):237-45.
26. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhe-sives-a microtensile bond strength and morpho-logical study. Dent Mater. 2001 Sept; 17 (5):373-80.
27. Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure tech-nique. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug; 25(4):292-8.
28. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004 Jun; 83(6):454-8.
29. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive sys-tems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res. 1998 Jan;77(1):50-9.
30. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No): 3D-18D.
31. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Ma-ter. 2001 Sept;17(5):430-44.
32. Bernades Kde O, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP, Garcia FC, Pereira PN. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfac-es and dental bonding: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Nov;145(11):1120-8.
33. Hamama HH, Burrow MF, Yiu C. Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives. Aust Dent J. 2014 Jun; 59 (2):193-200.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Atefat M, Sadeghi M. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Generations of Resin Bonding Agents and Glass Ionomer to Dentin. J Iran Dent Assoc 2015; 27 (1) :58-63
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1735-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 1 (1-2015) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645