1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955 Dec;34(6):849-53. 2. Chandler HH, Bowen RL, Paffenbarger GC, Mullineaux AL. Clinical investigation of a
radiopaque composite restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970 Oct; 81(4):935-40. 3. Miguez PA, Castro PS, Nunes MF, Walter R, Pereira PN. Effect of acid-etching on the enam-el bond of two self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent. 2003 Summer;5(2):107-12. 4. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding
systems. J Adhes Dent. 2000 Spring;2(1):57-65. 5. Goldstein RE. Is your spouse's smile aesthetic? Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003 Oct; 15(9):703. 6. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The
effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):177-83. 7. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992 Feb; 23(2): 135-41. 8. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N.
Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug;3(4):133-8. 9. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J. 1968 Nov 5; 124(9):381-4. 10. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972 Feb; 15,132(4):133-5. 11. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer
liner/base. J Dent Res. 1991 Jan;70(1):72-4. 12. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
Assessment by nano-indentation of the hard-ness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993 Oct; 72(10):1434-42. 13. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhe-sives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005 Sept;21(9):864-81. 14. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years. Oper Dent. 2002 Sept-Oct; 27(5):438-41. 15. Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP, Bui HT, Mitra SB. In-hibition of dentin demineralization adjacent to a glass-ionomer/ composite sandwich restoration. Quintessence Int. 2009 Apr; 40(4):287-94. 16. Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volu-metric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater. 1998 Nov; 14(6):417-23. 17. Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bond-ing systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Sept; 25(9):666-71. 18. Neelima L, Sathish ES, Kandaswamy D;
Bupesh. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of total-etch, self-etch, and glass iono-mer adhesive to human dentin: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2008 Apr-Jun; 19(2):129-33. 19. Satish G, Gopikrishna V, Ballal SN,
Kandaswamy D, Mamatha Y. Evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of a total etch adhesive in comparison with a self-etching adhesive and a
resin modified glass ionomer adhesive-An in-vitro fluorescent dye penetration test. J Conserv Dent. 2006 Dec; 9(2):55-62. 20. El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to den-tin: effect of smear layer thickness and differ-ent dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Dec;10(6):471-9. 21. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998 Sept-Oct; 23(5):244-9. 22. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, In-oue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore
memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and den-tin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35. 23. De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L, De Boever J. An 18-year
retrospective survival study of full crowns with or without posts. Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr; 19 (2):136-42. 24. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thick-ness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):97-104. 25. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y,
Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meer-beek
B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven
contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent.
2001 Fall;3(3):237-45. 26. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhe-sives-a microtensile bond strength and morpho-logical study. Dent Mater. 2001 Sept; 17 (5):373-80. 27. Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H. Microleakage of light-cured resin and
resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure tech-nique. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug; 25(4):292-8. 28. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional
monomers. J Dent Res. 2004 Jun; 83(6):454-8. 29. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive sys-tems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res. 1998 Jan;77(1):50-9. 30. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No): 3D-18D. 31. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of
contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II:
etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Ma-ter. 2001 Sept;17(5):430-44. 32. Bernades Kde O, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP,
Garcia FC, Pereira PN. The influence of
hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfac-es and dental bonding: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Nov;145(11):1120-8. 33. Hamama HH, Burrow MF, Yiu C. Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives. Aust Dent J. 2014 Jun; 59 (2):193-200.
|