[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 31, Issue 3 (7-2019) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2019, 31(3): 146-153 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Finishing and Polishing Time, Technique and Surface Coating on Microleakage of Encapsulated Restorative Resin Modified Glass Ionomer: An In Vitro Study
Fariba Ezoji1 , Ghazaleh Ahmadi Zenouz1 , Adeleh Yousefi * 2, Soraya Khafri3
1- Assistant Professor, Dental Materials Research Center, Institute of Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2- Dental Student, Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , ad_yousefi@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Social Medicine and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
Abstract:   (3195 Views)
Background and Aim: This study aimed to assess the effect of finishing and polishing time, technique and surface coating on microleakage of encapsulated restorative resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI).
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 40 freshly extracted human premolars were selected. Two standard class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. The prepared teeth were randomly assigned to eight experimental groups (n=10) according to the finishing and polishing time, technique and surface coating. The samples were blindly examined for marginal microleakage using a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the obtained data with the level of significance set at P<0.05.
Results: Groups with surface coating showed significantly lower microleakage than uncoated samples (P<0.001). The groups in which discs were used had lower microleakage (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with delayed or immediate finishing and polishing (P>0.05). Our results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between enamel and dentinal walls with regard to marginal microleakage scores (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Immediate finishing and polishing of coated restorations with Sof-Lex discs decreases their marginal microleakage. Also, it is more effective at the gingival margin.
Keywords: Dental Marginal Adaptation, Dental Polishing, Glass Ionomer Cements, Dental Leakage
Full-Text [PDF 613 kb]   (1335 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol. 1982 Nov;11(6):439-50.
2. Phillips RW. New concepts in materials used for restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1965 Mar;70:652-61.
3. Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):253-9.
4. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):60-9.
5. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative ma-terials: a review. Aust Dent J. 2004 Sep; 49(3):112-21.
6. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32.
7. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical prop-erties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res. 1991 Jan;70(1):72-4.
8. Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Droz D. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials. J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 May-Aug;75(2):125-33.
9. Sidhu SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res. 1997 Aug;76(8):1495-501.
10. Kitayama S, Nasser NA, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Ni-kaido T, Tagami J, et al. Effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of Class II computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations: a confocal microscopic study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011 May;69(3):182-92.
11. Miyazaki M, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of sur-face coatings on flexural properties of glass ion-omers. Eur J Oral Sci 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):600-4.
12. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 2001 Sep;86(3):309-14.
13. Delgado AJ, Ritter AV, Donovan TE, Ziemiecki T, Heymann HO. Effect of finishing techniques on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;27(4):184-93.
14. Anusavice K. Shen C. Rawls HR. Science of Den-tal Materials. 12th ed., St Louis, Missouri: Else-vier; 2012.p 197-8.
15. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73.
16. Magni E, Zhang L, Hickel R, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing. J Dent. 2008 Nov;36(11):885-91.
17. Mirzaie M, Yasini E, Kermanshah H, Omidi BR. The effect of mechanical load cycling and pol-ishing time on microleakage of class V glass-ionomer and composite restorations: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jan;11(1):100-8.
18. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Spring;3(1):45-64.
19. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, García-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):198-211.
20. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004 Sep;29(5):481-508.
21. Karaoğlanoğlu S, Akgül N, Ozdabak HN, Akgül HM. Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins. Dent Mater J 2009;28(1):96-101.
22. Yap AU, Tan S, Teh TY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass–ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Feb;27(2):117-23.
23. Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Class I gap-formation in highly-viscous glass-ionomer restorations: Delayed vs. immediate polishing. Oper Dent 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):196-202.
24. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):610-5.
25. Yap AU, Lim CC, Neo CL. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int. 1995 Nov;26(11):817-20.
26. Bell RB, Barkmeier WW. Glass-ionomer restoratives and liners: shear bond strength to dentin. J Esthet Dent. 1994;6(3):129-34.
27. Tjan AH, Dunn JR. Microleakage at gingival den-tin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Dec; 121(6):706-10.
28. Martin FE, O'Rourke M. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-coloured restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Aust Dent J. 1993 Apr;38(2):102-7.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ezoji F, Ahmadi Zenouz G, Yousefi A, Khafri S. Effect of Finishing and Polishing Time, Technique and Surface Coating on Microleakage of Encapsulated Restorative Resin Modified Glass Ionomer: An In Vitro Study. J Iran Dent Assoc 2019; 31 (3) :146-153
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-2052-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 31, Issue 3 (7-2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645