|
1. Ferdousi MA, Al Mamun A, Banu LA, Paul S.
Angular photogrammetric analysis of the facial
profile of the adult Bangladeshi garo. Adv.
Anthropol. 2013;3(04):188. 2. Hershon LE, Giddon DB. Determinants of
facial profile self-perception. Am J Orthod. 1980;
78(3):279-95. 3. Hartmann D, Ruzicka T, Gauglitz GG.
Complications associated with cutaneous
aesthetic procedures.J Dtsch Dermatol Ges.
2015; 13(8): 778-86. 4. Moshkelgosha V, Fathinejad S , Pakizeh Z,
Shamsa M, Golkari A. Photographic facial soft
tissue analysis by means of linear and angular
measurements in an adolescent persian
population. Open Dent J. 2015;9:346. 5. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF.
Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104(2):180-7. 6. Choe KS, Sclafani AP, Litner JA, Yu GP, Romo
T. The Korean American woman's face:
anthropometric measurements and quantitative
analysis of facial aesthetics. Arch Facial Plast S.
2004;6(4):244-52. 7. Fernández‐Riveiro P, Smyth‐Chamosa E,
Suárez‐Quintanilla D, Suárez‐Cunqueiro M.
Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft
tissue facial profile. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25(4):
393-9. 8. Beugre J-B, Diomande M, Assi AR, Koueita MK,
Vaysse F. Angular photogrammetric analysis
and evaluation of facial esthetics of young
Ivorians with normal dental occlusion. Int.
Orthod. 2017;15(1):25-39. 9. Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and
extension patterns. Angle Orthod. 1959;29(2);
93-104. 10. Porter JP, Olson KL. Anthropometric facial
analysis of the African American woman. Arch
Facial Plast S. 2001;3(3):191-7. 11. Sforza C, Laino A, D’Alessio R, Grandi G,
Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM, et al.
Three-dimensional facial morphometry of
attractive Italian women. Prog Orthod. 2007; 8
(282):293. 12. Sforza C, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Grandi G,
Tartaglia GM, Ferrario VF. Soft-tissue facial
characteristics of attractive and normal
adolescent boys and girls. Angle Orthod. 2008;
78(5);799-807. 13. Asghari A, Rajaeih S, Hassannia F,
Tavakolifard N, Neisyani HF, Kamrava SK, et al.
Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of
healthy Iranian young adults: anthropometric
and angular measurements. Med J Islam Repub
Iran. 2014;28:49. 14. Subtelny J. A longitudinal study of soft tissue
facial structures and their profile
characteristics, defined in relation to underlying
skeletal structures. Am J Orthod. 1959; 45(7):
481-507. 15. Malkoç S, Demir A, Uysal T, Canbuldu N.
Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft
tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. Eur J
Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):174-9. 16. Mehta P, SagaRkaR RM, Mathew S.
Photographic assessment of cephalometric
measurements in skeletal class II cases: A
comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11
(6):ZC60. 17. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance
in treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1967; 53
(4):262-84. 18. Jamilian A, Darnahal A, Hamedi R, Kamali Z,
Toopchi S. Photogrammetric analysis of facial
profile in Persian adults. Gen Dent. 2016; 64
(2)52-5. 19. Ajami S, Najafi HZ, Mahdavi S. Angular
photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue
facial profile of Iranian young adults. Iran J
Orthod.2015;10(2) . 20. Filipović GL, Stojanović NM, Jovanović ID,
Randjelović PJ, Ilić IR, Djordjević NS, et al.
Differences in angular photogrammetric
soft-tissue facial characteristics among parents
and their offspring. Medicina. 2019 May; 55(5):
197. 21. Pandian KS, Krishnan S, Kumar SA. Angular
photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue
facial profile of Indian adults. Indian J Dent Res.
2018 Mar;29(2):137. 22. Anicÿ-Miloševicÿ S, Lapter-Varga M, Šlaj M.
Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by
means of angular measurements. Eur J Orthod.
2008;30(2):13.
|
