[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 22, Issue 4 (Foll Text in Persian 2010) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2010, 22(4): 233-239 Back to browse issues page
Comparing the retention of two different designs of resin bonded restorations
Farshad Bajoghli, Saeid Nosouhian *1, Mohammad Seyedmozafare
1- , nosouhian@dnt.mui.ac.ir
Abstract:   (11236 Views)

  Comparing the retention of two different designs of resin bonded restorations

  

  Dr. Bajoghli F .,1 Dr. Nosouhian S .,1 Dr. Seyedmozafare M .2

  1 Assistant Professor, Department of P rosthodontics , School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan , Iran. 2 Dentist.

 

  (Received 18 Feb, 2010 Accepted 24 Oct, 2010)

  Abstract

  

  Background and Aim : Prosthesis design has an important effect on its retention, especially in Resin Bonded Restorations (RBRs) in which preparation is conservative since there are different design possibilities to fabricate RBRs. The aim of this study was to compare the retention of RBRs with two different designs .

  Materials and Methods : In this experimental study, twenty-two RBRs were fabricated from twenty-two premolar and second molar teeth which had the same size and no carries. In the first group, conventional preparation which included lingual preparation, guiding planes, occlusal rests and two grooves in interproximal areas, was perfomed. In the second group, preparation included only class II inlay cavity preparation on the edentulous side. After frame work fabrication, the samples were cemented with resin cement (Panavia F), and subjected to tensile force. The force required to separate each sample was recorded and the results in the two groups were compared by t test.

  Results : Average retention in the group with conventional design was 39.523 ± 8.62 kgf and 25.715 ± 4.10 kgf in the group with modified design. The difference was shown significant by the statistical t test (P<0.001).

  Conclusion : Results indicate that the design with conventional preparation had a higher retention than the modified design that has only Class II intercoronal retainers.

  Key words : Dental Prosthesis Retention - Dental Prosthesis - Denture - Fixed - Resin-Bonded - Resin Cement - Tooth Preparation - Prosthodontic .

 

  Corresponding Author : Dr. Nosouhian S ., Assistant Professor, Department of P rosthodontics , School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan , Iran.

  e.mail: nosouhian@dnt.mui.ac.ir

 

Keywords: Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Denture, Fixed, Resin-Bonded, Resin Cement, Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic.
Full-Text [PDF 229 kb]   (2396 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Porosthodontics
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bajoghli F, Nosouhian S, Seyedmozafare M. Comparing the retention of two different designs of resin bonded restorations. J Iran Dent Assoc. 2010; 22 (4) :233-239
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-814-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 4 (Foll Text in Persian 2010) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4374