﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Iranian Dental Association</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Iranian Dental Association</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-8201</Issn>
      <Volume>24</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Effects of Different Growth Factors on New Bone Formation: A Systematic Review</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>122</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>138</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hosain</FirstName>
        <LastName>Behnia</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Arash</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khojasteh</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Esmaeelinejad</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Navid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Naghdi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>22</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>28</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>  &lt;i&gt;Background and Aim&lt;/i&gt;: Using different osteogenic growth factors, which is still under investigation, is a favorable method for bone regeneration. This systematic review is aimed at evaluating the effects of different growth factors and their carriers on osteogenesis .  &lt;i&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/i&gt;: Electronic databases (Medline, EMBase and Cochrane) were studied by the authors for articles published from 1999 to October 2010. Clinical and animal studies evaluating bone formation by applying a specific growth factor and the related carrier were included in this investigation. Obtained data were organized in a table and evaluated through a qualitative analysis .  &lt;i&gt;Results&lt;/i&gt;: Sixty-nine studies most of which evaluated the effects of BMP-2 osteogenesis in different models were included in this study. Totally, twenty-five carriers were applied with different growth factors in the experiments. Among these carriers, poly lactic– co glycolic acid (PLGA), hydroxy apatite/tricalcium phosphate/absorbable collagen sponge (HA/TCP/ACS) and BioOss were the most frequently used carriers with the growth factors in bone regeneration studies.  &lt;i&gt;Conclusion&lt;/i&gt;: The current evidence, although not strong enough, confirms that BMP-2 has more favorable results in osteogenesis compared with other factors. The carrier scaffold, methods of measurement (histologic or radiographic), type of animal, defect diameter and the length of follow-up are the variables that should be matched before reaching definite results for the effect of growth factors in bone regeneration . </Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>