﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Iranian Dental Association</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Iranian Dental Association</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-8201</Issn>
      <Volume>28</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Effect of the Educational Pamphlet on the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>118</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>125</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30699/jidai.29.4.118</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ferena</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sayar</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Vatanpour</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahmoud</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shabahangfar</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-8879</Identifier>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.30699/jidai.29.4.118</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>30</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>30</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the structural integrity of multiple-choice questions according to the Millman checklist, and to assess thedistinguishing power of these questions between weak and strong students in&lt;br&gt; theoretical courses of Periodontics in an academic year (2014-15) in Dental Branch of Tehran Islamic Azad University.&lt;br&gt; Materials and Methods: A total of 262 students comprising periodontics module 1, 2 and 3 in two semesters responded to 240 multiple-choice questions and results from the two consecutive semesters were compared with each other. ANOVA was used to analyse data. P&lt;0.05 was considered significant.&lt;br&gt; Results: There was no statistical difference between the difficulty coefficient of the questions in the two semesters for Periodontics module 1, 2, and 3 (P-values were0.2, 0.34 and 0.69, respectively). For discrimination coefficient, there was no significant&lt;br&gt; difference between Periodontics module 2 (P=0.72) and 3(P=0.42) in the two semesters, however, in Periodontics module 1 this difference was significant (P=0.017). Although a favourable change in the indicators of Millman checklist was seen in the second&lt;br&gt; semester, it was not statistically significant (P= 0.65).In total, the difficulty and&lt;br&gt; discrimination coefficients revealed that the majority of questions were "medium&lt;br&gt; difficult".&lt;br&gt; Conclusion: Although the educational pamphlet did not significantly improve the&lt;br&gt; quality of multiple-choice questions, some Millman checklist items improved slightly. &lt;br&gt; Key Words: Millman checklist, Discrimination coefficient, Difficulty coefficient, Periodontics, Multiple choice questions (MCQ)&lt;br&gt; </Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>