﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Iranian Dental Association</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Iranian Dental Association</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-8201</Issn>
      <Volume>29</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Comparison of the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Incisors Restored with Six Different Post and Core Systems</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>168</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>176</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30699/jidai.29.4.168</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ramin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mosharraf</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-5754</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahmood</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sabouhi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Meysam</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mahabadi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Behzadi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahmood Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kalantar Motamedi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.30699/jidai.29.4.168</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>19</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>19</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and Aim: Different methods and materials are available for post and core (P&amp;C) fabrication. We aimed to compare the fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with six different P&amp;C systems.&lt;br&gt; Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, after endodontic treatment and coronal preparation of 60 maxillary central incisors, six different P&amp;C systems were used: 1) cast base metal P&amp;C, 2) cast gold alloy P&amp;C, 3) zirconia post and casting ceramic core, 4) zirconia post and composite core, 5) titanium post and composite core, and 6) fiber post and composite core. Thermocycling (5-55°C, 60 seconds, 1500 cycles) was performed after cementing the full metal crowns on each tooth. A 130° force was ap-plied at a crosshead speed of 1.5 mm/minute in a universal testing machine. The frac-ture force (N) and fracture patterns were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-U-Whitney, and Fisher’s exact tests (α=0.05).&lt;br&gt; Results: The highest mean fracture resistance was recorded in the first group (904±302.77 N) followed by the third group (725±202.11 N), second group (723±224.15 N), fourth group (675±358.64 N), fifth group (424±156.85 N), and sixth group (416.5±81.58 N). The groups with casting P&amp;Cs and zirconia post and casting core showed significant differences with the other two groups with non-casting cores (P&lt;0.001).&lt;br&gt; Conclusion: The highest fracture resistance was recorded for cast metal P&amp;C, which may be due to a better stress distribution. Zirconia post and ceramic core may be a proper and aesthetically appealing substitute for cast metal P&amp;C.</Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>