﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Iranian Dental Association</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Iranian Dental Association</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-8201</Issn>
      <Volume>32</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted with Different Resin Cements</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>7</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30699/jidai.32.1.2.1</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ehsan</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-4414</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Navid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haghayegh</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Fatemeh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Salehi Ghalesefid</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3935-2604</Identifier>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.30699/jidai.32.1.2.1</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>18</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>20</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and Aim: Dislodgment of prosthetic crowns is a common occurrence. In such cases, recementation is a suitable treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the retention in cementation and recementation using different resin ce-ments.&lt;br&gt; Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 40 premolars were se-lected (n=10). They were standardized relative to some properties and then the wax patterns were prepared and cast. After 24 h, all specimens were decemented using In-stron universal testing machine. The castings were then re-cemented and stored under the same conditions. After 24 h, the cemented copings were dislodged, and the separa-tion load was recorded.&lt;br&gt; Results: The highest and the lowest mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 and Maxcem cements in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. Paired sample t-test showed a significant difference in the retention of G-CEM group between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.009). The two-factorial repeated measures ANOVA showed the significant effect of cement type on retention (P=0.009), and there was a significant difference in retention between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.006). The Tukey’s HSD test re-vealed a significant difference in retentive strength between the Maxcem and Panavia F2 (P=0.011). The lowest mean difference was observed between Bifix SE and Maxcem groups (-16.75 kgf, P=0.89).&lt;br&gt; Conclusion: The maximum and minimum mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 cement and Maxcem in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the initial cementation and recementation in G-CEM group.</Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>