[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aim & Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing & Abstracting
Advertising Policy
Editorial Policies::
Peer Review Process
Section Policies
Open Access Policy
Ethical Requirements
Publication Ethics
Plagiarism Policy
Article Processing Charges (APC)
Authorship Conflicts
Intellectual Properties
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Online Submmision
Instruction to Authors
Peer review process
Publication Ethics
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 24, Issue 3 (7-2012) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2012, 24(3): 146-151 Back to browse issues page
Clinical Comparison of Dental Caries by DMFT and ICDAS Systems
Sepideh Banava * 1, Melika Fattah2 , Mohammad javad Kharrazifard3 , Tahmineh Safaie4 , Shima Askarzadeh4 , Mohammad Safaie Yazdi4 , Banet .T. Amaechi5 , Mahta Fazlyab6
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Azad University. Tehran, Iran
2- Dentist
3- Dentist, Epidemiologist, Member of Research Center of Dental Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran
4- Dental Student
5- Associate Professor, San Antonio Dental Faculty. Texas, USA
6- Postgraduate Student, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Azad University. Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (14187 Views)
  Background and Aim : The common method of caries status evaluation is the number of decayed, missed and filled teeth (DMFT) index. Recently the International Caries Diagnosis and Assessment System (ICDAS) has been introduced for a detailed evaluation of the dental caries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the caries status with this new system while comparing it with the DMF index as a common method .

  Materials and Methods : A total of 110 dental students were selected randomly and examined. Examination was done in the dental unit under good light circumstances. First, all surfaces of the teeth were cleaned with a brush, rubber cup and prophylaxis paste and then rinsed. Subsequently, examination was performed in each person by two calibrated examiners according to DMFT system and ICDAS (evaluation of teeth status in occlusal and smooth surfaces in dry and wet situations according to codes of this system) and the information forms were completed. Chi square statistical test was used for data analysis .

  Results : The mean DMFT was 7.16. According to ICDAS system nobody had 00 code meaning that at least one surface of 182 dental surfaces had a lesion. Only seven cases had codes 00-02. The results for codes 03 through 06 were as follow, respectively: 51, 49, 34, 2. Ninety nine cases had extracted or non-examinable teeth. The inter-examiner kappa coefficient was 0.916 .

  Conclusion : The new system, ICDASl, provides more accurate information than DMF for the investigators and epidemiologists. The DMFT number does not show any details about the dental status of the cases .

 

  

 

Keywords: Dental caries, ICDAS, DMF
Full-Text [PDF 162 kb]   (7651 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Roberson TM, Heymann H, Edward J. Swift. Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentis-try. 4th ed. London; John schrefer; 2006, 108-112.
2. Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Dental caries: The dis-ease and it’s clinical management. 2nd ed. [S.L]: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008, 104,116,118-122,130-137,142,145.
3. Ferreira Zandoná A, Santiago E, Eckert G, Fontana M, Ando M, Zero D.T. Use of ICDAS combined with quantitative light-induced fluo-rescence as a caries detection method. Caries Res. 2010;44(3):317-322.
4. Fontana M, Zero DT, Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Gray SK. Techniques for assessing tooth sur-faces in school-based sealant programs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(7):854-60.
5. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): An integrated system for measuring dental caries. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):170-178.
6. Banting D, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, Fer-reira-Zandoná A, Ismail AI, Longbottom C, et al. Rationale and evidence for the international Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II). Proceedings of the 7th Indiana Conference; 2005 Sep; Indiana, USA. pp. 161-221.
7. Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Lemos MI, Loza-no MP, Higuera C. Plaque, caries level and oral hygiene habits in young patients receiving or-thodontic treatment. Com Dent Health. 2010 Sep;27(3):133-8.
8. Shoaib L, Deery C, Ricketts DN, Nugent ZJ. Validity and reproducibility of ICDAS II in primary teeth. Caries Res. 2009 Jun;43(6):442-448.
9. Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Pieper K. Repro-ducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for de-tection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res. 2008; 42(2):79–87.
10. Mehta N, Zandona A, Ando M, Eckert G. Detection of Proximal lesions: ICDAS II versus Caries Detection Devices. 2009 IADR/ AADR/ CADR 87th General Session and Exhibition; April1-4; Miami, Florida, USA. Available: www.iadr.com.
11. Kühnisch J, Berger S, Goddon I, Senkel H, Pitts N, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Occlusal caries detection in permanent molars according to WHO basic methods, ICDAS II and laser fluo-rescence measurements. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Dec; 36(6):475-484.
12. Parsa GZ. Dental caries prevalance and mean dmf-t among school children. 2002 IADR/ AADR/CADR 80th General Session; March 6-9; San Diego, Califor-nia, USA. Available: www.iadr.com.
13. Gordon M, Sarnat H, Kharouba J, Amir E. Caries experience and dental treatment needs of elementary school children. The preliminary program for 2002 annual meeting of the IADR- Israeli Division; 2002 June 13-14.
14. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DN, Rolfsen S, Stoll R, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Stachniss V, et al. Performance of laser fluorescence at tooth surface and histological section. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Mar;26(2):171-8.
15. Shoaib L, Deery C, Ricketts DN, Nugent ZJ. Validity and reproducibility of ICDAS II in primary teeth. Caries Res. 2009;43(6):442-448.
16. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DNJ, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Stoll R, Stachniss V, Pieper K. Impact of scoring single or multiple occlusal lesions on estimates of diagnostic accu-racy of the visual ICDAS-II system. Int J Dent. 2009.
17. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro RC, Lussi A. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Oct; 37(5):399-404.
18. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DN, Weber K, Ziomek O, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Schip-per HM et al. Effect of different time intervals between examinations on the reproducibility of ICDAS- II for occlusal caries. Caries Res. 2010; 44(3):267-271.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Banava S, Fattah M, Kharrazifard M J, Safaie T, Askarzadeh S, Safaie Yazdi M, et al . Clinical Comparison of Dental Caries by DMFT and ICDAS Systems. J Iran Dent Assoc 2012; 24 (3) :146-151
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1255-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 3 (7-2012) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660