[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 24, Issue 4 (10-2012) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2012, 24(4): 187-191 Back to browse issues page
An In Vitro Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Nanosil and ChlorhexidineMouthrinses
Vahid Esfahanian1 , Ferida Mohamadi * 2, Shahram Amini3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Azad University. Isfahan, Iran
2- Dentist , Ferida_m@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Azad University. Khorasgan, Iran
Abstract:   (11707 Views)

  Background and Aim: Regarding chemical methods of plaque control, use mouthrinses are more frequent than other methods. The objective of this research is making a comparison between the antibacterial effect of Nanosil and chlorhexidine mouthwashes .

  Materials and Methods: In this experimental study samples were taken from supragingival and subgingival plaques of 15 patients and transferred to aerobic and anaerobic liquid culture environments. The number of the bacteria in both aerobic and anaerobic liquid environments were determined by spectrophotometer. Then, the samples were transferred from the liquid culture environment to the considered solid culture environment as a mixture of nanosil and chlorhexidine mouthwashes and placebo and the numbers of the growth colonies in the solid culture environment were counted in each group and compared with each other by t test .

  Results: In both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, the number of the growth colonies, was depicted in ascending order the groups of chlorhexidine, nanosil, and placebo. Concerning chlorhexidine, there was no significant difference between the growth colonies in the two aerobic and anaerobic environments indicating the absolute antibacterial effect of this mouthwash.

  Nanosil mouthwash had a significant statistical superiority in comparison with the placebo in both aerobic and anaerobic environments. Nanosil had a significant effect on anaerobic environment, meanwhile, the placebo indicated a superior effect in anaerobic environment .

  Conclusion : Nanosil mouthwash can be applied as an effective antibacterial substance especially in an anaerobic environment, though chlorhexidine as a standard mouthwash has still the strongest effect in this field .

 

 
Keywords: Dental plaque, Mouth wash, Nanosil, Chlorhexidine digluconate
Full-Text [PDF 144 kb]   (2934 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Periodontology
References
1. Aliakbari E. An invitro comparison of antimi-crobial effect of irsha and chlorhexidine mouth-rinses. [Thesis]. Isfahan: School of dentistry, Khorasgan University of Medical Science; 2004.
2. Newman M, Takei H, Carranza F. Carranza`s clinical periodontology, 10thed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2011, 249-451-225.
3. Zare Bidaki M. Microbiology of plaque and dental caries, 1thed. Mashhad: Mashhad Publish-ing Co; 1997, 52.
4. Linde J, Karring T, Plang N. Clinical periodon-tolagy and implant dentistry. 4thed. Copenha-gen: Munksgaard; 2003, 148.
5. Linde J, Karring T, Plang N. Clinical periodon-tology and implant dentistry. 3thed. Copenha-gen: Munksgaard; 1998, 468, 475, 476, 479, 480.
6. http://www.ngdir.ir/Minemineral chapter Detail. asp? PID=2750.
7. http://www.Forum.niksalehi.com.show thread. php? t=25083.
8. http://www.sanosil.com/-disinfactants-m.htm.
9. Moran J, Addy M, Wade W. The effect of oxi-dising mouthrinses compared with chlorhexi-dine on salivary bacterial counts and plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontal. 1995 Oct; 22(10):750-5.
10. Gusberti FA, Sampathkumar P, Siegrist BE, Lang NP. Microbiological and clinical effects of chlorhexidine digluconate and hydrogen perox-ide mouthrinses on developing plaque and gin-givitis. J Clin Periodont. 1988Jan; 15(1):60-7.
11. Menendez A, Li F, Michalek S, kirk k, Makhija S, Childers N. Comparative analysis of antibac-terial effects of combined mouthrinses on Strep tococcus mutans. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005 Feb; 20(1):31-34.
12. http://www.irden.com/articles/summary-doc/section.php?ELEMENT-ID=104604.
13. Baron E, Peterson R, Fine gold S. Baily and Scott’s diagnostic microbiology. 9thed. St Louis: Mosby;1994,170.
14. Bajaj N, Tandon S. The effect of Triphala and Chlorhexidine mouthwash on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and microbial growth. Int J Ayurveda Res. 2011 Jan; 2(1):29-36.
15. Zelic O,Cakic S,Lukovic N.The effect of two different oral antiseptics on dental plaque for-mation(de novo biofilm)and on gingival in-flammation. Srp Arh Celok Lek.2009Jan-Feb; 137(1-2):6-9.
16. Koban I, Holtfreter B, Hubner NO, Matthes R. Antimicrobial efficacy of non-thermal plasma in comparision to chlorhexidine against dental biofilms on titanium discs in vitro-proof of principle experiment. J Clin Periodontal. 2011 Oct; 38(10): 956-65.
17. Clayden N, Smith S, Stiller S, Newcombe RG, Addy M. A comparision of the plaque-inhibitory properties of stannous fluoride and low-concentration chlorhexidine mouthrinses. J Clin Periodontal. 2002 Dec; 29(12):1072-7.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Esfahanian V, Mohamadi F, Amini S. An In Vitro Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Nanosil and ChlorhexidineMouthrinses. J Iran Dent Assoc 2012; 24 (4) :187-191
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1282-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 4 (10-2012) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645