[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 17, Issue 5 (Foll Text in Persian 2005) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2005, 17(5): 61-67 Back to browse issues page
Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone level measurement pre and at gingival surgery
Roya Shariatmadar Ahmadi * 1, Khosro Mani Kashani , Narges Dorri
1- , R-shariatmadar46@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (13681 Views)

Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone level measurement pre and at gingival surgery

Dr. R. Shariatmadar Ahmadi* - Dr. KH. Mani Kashani** - Dr. N. Dorri***

* - Assistant Professor of Periodontics Dept. Faculty of Dentistry – Hamedan University of Medical Sciences.

**- Assistant Professor of MSPH Dept. – Faculty of Medicine – Hamedan University of Medical Sciences.

*** - Dentist.

Background and Aim: Surgical bone level probing is the most precise method for the deter-mination of bone level regeneration in regenerative therapy but due to the aggressive and dam-aging nature of this procedure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the precision and accuracy of bone probing measurement as a non-surgical method to determine bone level changes.

Materials and Methods: In this analytic- comparative study, 22 maxillary molars and premo-lars in patients with chronic periodontitis participated. An acrylic resin stent was made for the bone probing depth (BPD) measurements, surgical bone level measurements as well as proper orientation of probe of each sample. The mesial, distal, mid-buccal and mid-palatal aspects of each tooth were measured.

Results: Differences between surgical bone probing and bone probing depth measurements in different surfaces of messiobuccal, mid buccal, disto buccal and mid palatal were 0.09±0.74, 0.068±1.01, 0.24±0.11 and 0.28±0.88, respectively, which were not statistically significant (P<0.05), however, there was positive coefficient of correlation in all surfaces (Y=0.97).

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that, regardless of probing surface, type of tooth and the presence of intrabony defects, there is a minimal difference between BPD and SBL and probing depth (PB) measurement can be a reliable method to estimate bone level regenera-tion following periodontal treatment and to replace surgical bone level (SBL) procedure.

Key words: Sounding – Probing – Bone - Gingiva

Keywords: Sounding, Probing, Bone, Gingiva
Full-Text [PDF 160 kb]   (3441 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shariatmadar Ahmadi R, Mani Kashani K, Dorri N. Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone level measurement pre and at gingival surgery. J Iran Dent Assoc 2005; 17 (5) :61-67
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-150-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 17, Issue 5 (Foll Text in Persian 2005) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645