[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 27, Issue 3 (7-2015) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2015, 27(3): 138-143 Back to browse issues page
Prevalence of Mandibular Retromolar Canal on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan
Kamal Amini1 , Roshanak Ghafari2 , Shadi Kazemi * 3, Fatemeh Bagheri4
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran
2- Postgraduate student, Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran
3- Postgraduate student, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran , sh.kazemi@@khuisf.ac.ir
4- Dentist, Private Office, Qom, Iran
Abstract:   (2903 Views)

Background and Aim: The retromolar canal is an anatomical structure in the mandible and a type of bifid inferior alveolar canal. The retromolar canal may provide accessory innervation to the mandibular molars or contain an aberrant buccal nerve; thus, this canal is of clinical significance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of retromolar canal on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 151 inferior alveolar canals in 102 patients (102 unilateral and 49 bilateral) with third molar teeth requiring CBCT scans were evaluated. The scans were evaluated for presence of the retromolar canal and linear measurements (distance to second molar, height and width) were made. The data were analyzed paired t-test and chi square test.

Results: The prevalence of retromolar canal was 7.3% (n=11). With regard to linear measurements, the mean distance from the retromolar canal to the second molar was 12.76± 4.3mm. The mean height of the canal was 6.66 ±2.18mm, and the mean width was 1.7± 0.6mm. The presence of retromolar canal was not statistically correlated with sex, side of the jaw or age (p=0.146).

Conclusion: The prevalence of retromolar canal on CBCT scans was 7.3%.

Keywords: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Mandibular Nerve, Prevalence
Full-Text [PDF 666 kb]   (1573 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Endodontics
References
1. Auluck A, Pai KM, Mupparapu M. Multiple mandibular nerve canals: Radiographic observations and clinical relevance Report of 6 cases. Quintessence Int. 2007 Oct; 38(9):781-7.
2. Singh SK, Prabhu R, Mamatha G.P, Gupta A, Jain M. Morphologic variations in the mandibular canal: A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs. J Oral Health Res. 2010 Sept; 1(3): 106-12.
3. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013, 182,225,240.
4. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH. Cohen's pathways of the pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2011: 700-1.
5. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC, Ingle, JI. Ingle`s endodontics6. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2008,716.
6. Ossenberg NS. Retromolar foramen of the human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987 May; 73(1):119-28.
7. Von Arx T, Hänni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bronstein MM. Radiographic study of the mandibular Retromolar canal: An anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1630-5.
8. Sawyer DR, Kiely ML. Retromolar foramen: a mandibular variant important to dentistry. Ann Dent. 1991 Summer; 50(1):16-8.
9. Narayana K, Nayak UA, Ahmed WN, Bhat JG, Devaiah BA. The retromolar foramen and canal in south Indian dry mandibles. Eur J Anat. 2002 Dec; 6(3):141-6.
10. Kang JH, Lee KJ, Oh MJ, Choi H, Lee SR, Oh SH, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar; 44(1):53-60.
11. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jan-Feb; 24(1):155-9.
12. Sanchis JM, Penarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr; 61(4):422-4.
13. Priya R, Manjunath KY, Balasubramanyam. Retromolar foramen. Indian J Dent Res. 2005 Jan-Mar; 16(1):15-6.
14. Pyle MA, Jasinevivius TR, Lalumandier JA, Kohrs KJ, Sawyer DR. Prevalence and implications of accessory retromolar foramina in clinical dentistry. Gen Dent. 1999 Sept-Oct; 47(5): 500-3; quiz 504-5.
15. Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N. Clinical and anatomi-cal study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Oct;64(10):1493-7.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Amini K, Ghafari R, Kazemi S, Bagheri F. Prevalence of Mandibular Retromolar Canal on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan . J Iran Dent Assoc 2015; 27 (3) :138-143
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1807-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 3 (7-2015) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645