[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 31, Issue 4 (10-2019) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2019, 31(4): 195-202 Back to browse issues page
Dental Students’ Perception Towards Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry
Samaneh Razeghi1 , Mohammad Reza Khami2 , Mahsa Hasani * 3, Maryam Mohammadalizadeh4 , Mohammad Javad Kharazifard5
1- Associate Professor, Research Center for Caries Prevention, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Scienc-es, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor, Research Center for Caries Prevention, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Private Practice, Tehran, Iran , mhs.hasani@yahoo.com
4- Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
5- Research Member, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1730 Views)
Background and Aim: Management of children’s behavior is fundamental to a successful and effective dental treatment for children. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of dental students towards behavior guidance techniques in pediatric dentistry.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on dental students from three different levels of education. A questionnaire containing demographics, perceived acceptability of behavior guidance techniques (17 statements), and clinical situations (8 statements) was completed by the first-year, third-year, and last-year dental students. The questions were scored using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, the linear regression model, and the Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Totally, 264 dental students participated in this study. The most acceptable behavior guidance technique and clinical situation were positive reinforcement, and parent present during treatment, respectively. The least acceptable technique and clinical situation were passive immobilization, and showing the needle to the child, respectively. There were significant changes in acceptability scores of some behavior guidance techniques including voice control (P=0.00), hand over mouth (HOM) (P=0.00), using nitrous oxide (P=0.00), positive verbal reinforcement (P=0.00), active protective immobilization (P=0.00), passive protective immobilization (P=0.00), providing exact explanation (P=0.00), and general anesthesia (0.02) by increasing the level of education of students.
Conclusion: Non-aversive behavior guidance techniques had the most acceptable scores and some aversive techniques like immobilization, disallowing child speaking during treatment, and HOM had the least acceptable scores. Moreover, the higher the level of dental education, the greater the acceptability of some behavioral guidance techniques would be.
Keywords: Behavior Control, Pediatric Dentistry, Students, Dental, Perception
Full-Text [PDF 549 kb]   (782 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Oral Health and Epidemiology
References
1. Kawia HM, Mbawalla HS, Kahabuka FK. Application of behavior management techniques for paediatric dental patients by tan-zanian dental practitioners. Open Dent J. 2015Dec 31;9:455-61.
2. Dean JA, Jones JE, Vinson LAW, McDonald RE. McDonald and Avery's dentistry for the child and adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2016:e 286-9.
3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient 2015 [Available from: http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/BP_BehavGuide.pdf.
4. Al-Jobair AM, Al-Mutairi MA. Saudi dental stu-dents’ perceptions of pediatric behavior guid-ance techniques. BMC Med Educ. 2015 Sep 10;15:120.
5. York KM, Mlinac ME, Deibler MW, Creed TA, Ganem I. Pediatric behavior management tech-niques: a survey of predoctoral dental students. J Dent Educ. 2007 Apr;71(4):532-9.
6. Bimstein E, Azari AF, Sotto JJ, Riley JL. Students’ perceptions about pediatric dental be-havior guidance in an undergraduate four-year dental curriculum. J Dent Educ. 2009 Dec; 73(12):1366-71.
7. Ng MW. Behavior management conference pan-el IV report–Educational issues. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):180-3.
8. Adair SM. Behavior management conference panel I report–rationale for behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. Pediat Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):167-70.
9. Sotto JJ, Azari AF, Riley J, Bimstein E. First-year students’ perceptions about pediatric dental behavior guidance techniques: the effect of education. J Dent Educ. 2008 Sep; 72(9):1029-41.
10. Bimstein E, Azari AF, Riley JL. Predoctoral and postdoctoral students’ perspectives about pedi-atric dental behavior guidance. J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):616-25.
11. Adair SM, Schafer TE, Rockman RA, Waller JL. Survey of behavior management teaching in predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs. Pediatr Educ. 2004;26(2):143-50.
12. Jafarzadeh M, Eshghi AR, Saneei M. Effect of ed-ucational films compared to conventional be-havior control methods in pediatric dentistry on the attitude of dental students. J Isfahan Dent Sch. 2011;6(5):561-7.
13. Oueis HS, Ralstrom E, Miriyala V, Molinari GE, Casamassimo P. Alternatives for hand over mouth exercise after its elimination from the clinical guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2010;32(3):223-8.
14. Adair SM, Schafer TE, Waller JL, Rockman RA. Age and gender differences in the use of behav-ior management techniques by pediatric den-tists. Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):403-8.
15. Fotouhiardakani F, Ghandeharimotlagh M, Bah-rololoumi Z, Ghandeharimotlagh B. Evaluation of Educational Effect on Parent’s Attitude toward Different Behavioral Management Techniques for Children. Iranian J Pediatr Dent. 2017;12(2):63-70.
16. Sjöström O, Holst D. Validity of a questionnaire survey: response patterns in dif-ferent subgroups and the effect of social desirability. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002 Jun; 60 (3):136-40.
17. Helöe LA. Comparison of dental health data ob-tained from questionnaires, interviews and clin-ical examination. Scand J Dent Res 1972; 80(6):495-9.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razeghi S, Khami M R, Hasani M, Mohammadalizadeh M, Kharazifard M J. Dental Students’ Perception Towards Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry. J Iran Dent Assoc 2019; 31 (4) :195-202
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-2081-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 31, Issue 4 (10-2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645