Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted 
with Different Resin Cements

Ghasemi, Ehsan; Haghayegh, Navid; Salehi Ghalesefid, Fatemeh

doi:10.30699/jidai.32.1.2.1

[Home ] [Archive]

Main Menu

Journal Information

Editorial Policies

Articles archive

For Authors

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Last site contents
:: Contact Us

Volume 32, Issue 1 And 2 (1-2020)

J Iran Dent Assoc 2020, 32(1 And 2): 1-7

Back to browse issues page

Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted with Different Resin Cements

Ehsan Ghasemi¹

, Navid Haghayegh²

, Fatemeh Salehi Ghalesefid ^*

1- Assistant Professor, Dental Materials Research Center and Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Private Dentist, Specialist of Restorative Dentistry, Ontario, Canada
3- Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfa-han, Iran , Salehifa.1991@gmail.com

Abstract: (2222 Views)

Background and Aim: Dislodgment of prosthetic crowns is a common occurrence. In such cases, recementation is a suitable treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the retention in cementation and recementation using different resin ce-ments.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 40 premolars were se-lected (n=10). They were standardized relative to some properties and then the wax patterns were prepared and cast. After 24 h, all specimens were decemented using In-stron universal testing machine. The castings were then re-cemented and stored under the same conditions. After 24 h, the cemented copings were dislodged, and the separa-tion load was recorded.
Results: The highest and the lowest mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 and Maxcem cements in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. Paired sample t-test showed a significant difference in the retention of G-CEM group between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.009). The two-factorial repeated measures ANOVA showed the significant effect of cement type on retention (P=0.009), and there was a significant difference in retention between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.006). The Tukey’s HSD test re-vealed a significant difference in retentive strength between the Maxcem and Panavia F2 (P=0.011). The lowest mean difference was observed between Bifix SE and Maxcem groups (-16.75 kgf, P=0.89).
Conclusion: The maximum and minimum mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 cement and Maxcem in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the initial cementation and recementation in G-CEM group.

Keywords: Cementation, Dental Cements, Resin cements, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Tensile Strength

Full-Text [PDF 506 kb] (993 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original | Subject: Orthodontics

References

1. Wingo K. A review of dental cements. J Vet Dent. 2018 Mar;35(1):18-27.

2. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Woelfel JB. The effect of recementation on crown retention. Int J Prosthod. 1998 Mar-Apr;11(2):177-82.

3. Stamatacos C, Simon JF. Cementation of indirect restorations: an overview of resin cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Jan; 34(1):42-4, 6.

4. Nicholls J. Crown retention. Part II. The effect of convergence angle variation on the computed stresses in the luting agent. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 Jun;31(6):651-7.

5. Nicholls JI. Crown retention. Part I. Stress analy-sis of symmetric restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1974 Feb; 31(2):179-84.

6. Yettram AL, Wright KW, Pickard HM. Finite el-ement stress analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teet. J Dent Res. 1976 Nov-Dec; 55 (6):1004-11.

7. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth re-stored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Mar-Apr; 8(2):155-61.

8. Fan P, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Load fatigue of five restoration modalities in structurally compromised premolars. Int J Prosthodont. 1995 May-Jun;8(3):213-20.

9. Larson TD, Jensen JR. Microleakage of composite resin and amalgam core material under complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Jul;44(1):40-4.

10. Manso AP, Carvalho RM. Dental cements for lut-ing and bonding restorations: Self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct; 61 (4):821-34.

11. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a lit-erature review. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Aug;10(4): 251-8.

12. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evalu-ation of physical properties and surface degra-dation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Ma-ter J. 2007 Nov;26(6):906-14.

13. Kitzmüller K, Graf A, Watts D, Schedle A. Setting kinetics and shrinkage of self-adhesive resin cements depend on cure-mode and temperature. Dent Mater. 2011 Jun;27(6):544-51.

14. Ghasemi E, Rismanchian M, Haghayegh N. Eval-uation of tensile bond strength between dentin and metallic copings using different resin ce-ments. JDMT 2018 Summer;7(3):135-40.

15. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, White JT. Recementation of dental castings with zinc phosphate cement: effect on cement bond strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Nov;58(5):579-83.

16. Pastoret MH, Krastl G, Bühler J, Weiger R, Zitz-mann NU. Accuracy of a separating foil impression using a novel polyolefin foil compared to a custom tray and a stock tray technique. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;9(4):287-93.

17. Tjan AH, Li T. Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Apr;67(4):478-83.

18. Ghafoor R, Siddiqui AA, Rahman M. Assessment of convergence angle of full-coverage porcelain fused to metal crowns in clinical practice. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):241-6.

19. Schwartz IS. A review of methods and techniques to improve the fit of cast restorations. The J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Sep; 56 (3):279-83.

20. O'Connor RP, Nayyar A, Kovarik RE. Effect of internal microblasting on retention of cemented cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Nov; 64(5): 557-62.

21. Chan KC, Hormati AA, Boyer DB. Auxiliary reten-tion for complete crowns provided by cement keys. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Feb;45(2): 152-5.

22. Lövgren N, Roxner R, Klemendz S, Larsson C. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):95-101.

23. Frassetto A, Navarra C, Marchesi G, Turco G, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L, et al. Kinetics of polymeri-zation and contraction stress development in self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater. 2012 Sep;28(9):1032-9.

24. Gonçalves F, Pfeifer CC, Stansbury JW, Newman SM, Braga RR. Influence of matrix composition on polymerization stress development of experimental composites. Dent Mater. 2010 Jul;26(7):697-703.

25. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H,et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004 Jun; 83 (6):454-8.

26. Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res. 2008 Aug;87(8):757-61.

27. Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Kinuta S, Nishida H, Miyamae M, Yatani H. Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement. J Pros-thodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):59-64.

28. Adusei G, Deb S, Nicholson JW, Mou LY, Singh G. Polymerization behavior of an organophosphorus monomer for use in dental restorative materials. J Appl Polym Sc. 2003 April; 88(2):565-9.

29. Sahin G, Albayrak AZ, Sarayli Z, Avci D. Synthesis and photopolymerization of new dental monomers from o-hydroxyaryl phosphonates. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2006 Dec;44(23):6775-81.

30. Shafiei F, Behroozibakhsh M, Abbasian A, Shahnavazi S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Jan-Feb;15(1):63-70.

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.30699/jidai.32.1.2.1

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Ghasemi E, Haghayegh N, Salehi Ghalesefid F. Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted with Different Resin Cements. J Iran Dent Assoc 2020; 32 (1 and 2) :1-7
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-2092-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 32, Issue 1 And 2 (1-2020)

Back to browse issues page

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645