[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 32, Issue 3 And 4 (10-2020) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2020, 32(3 And 4): 67-74 Back to browse issues page
Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Composite Resin to Three Different Computer-Milled Cores After Thermocycling
Somayeh Zeighami1 , Safoura Ghodsi1 , Naghmeh Musapoor * 2
1- Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute and Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Gilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (1457 Views)
Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of an indirect composite resin to three different types of cores.
Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, 14 blocks (5×5×2 mm) were designed and milled by computer from cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone (PEEK). Each sample was treated according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the appropriate primer, and a layer of Crea.lign opaquer were applied on the surface. For micro-shear bond strength test, a plastic tube with an internal diameter of 1 mm and height of 2 mm was placed on each block, and Crea.lign paste was condensed in it. The Crea.lign paste and opaquer were light-cured separately for 180 s, and finally for 360 s. All samples were placed in 37°C distilled water for 24 h and thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5 to 55°C). The microtensile tester machine was used to measure the micro-shear bond strength. The samples were also evaluated for failure modes. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (P<0.05).
Results: According to one-way ANOVA, the mean micro-shear bond strength (MPa) in Co-Cr alloy, zirconia, and PEEK groups was 25.19±5.53, 23.49±5.48, and 20.58±5.68 MPa, respectively. There was no significant difference in micro-shear bond strength of the three groups (P= 0.099). The most frequent mode of failure in all three groups was adhesive, followed by mixed, and cohesive.
Conclusion: Applying the standard procedure, type of core material had no significant effect on the micro-shear bond strength of Crea.lign composite veneer.
Keywords: Chromium Alloys, Composite Resins, Polyetheretherketone, Shear Strength, Zirconium Oxide
Full-Text [PDF 738 kb]   (644 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Prosthodontics
References
1. Motta AB, Pereira LC, da Cunha AR. All-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures: a comparative study by 2D finite element analyses. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007; 15 (5):399-405.
2. Zeighami S, Mahgoli H, Farid F, Azari A. The effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength of core-veneer zirconia-based all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont. 2013 Jan;22(1):49-53.
3. Tabatabaian F. Color in zirconia-based restorations and related factors: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(2):201-11.
4. Jin HY, Teng MH, Wang ZJ, Li X, Liang JY, Wang WX, et al. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Oct;122(4):383-8.
5. Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater. 2014;30(8):e209-15.
6. Sreekala L, Narayanan M, Eerali SM, Eerali SM, Varghese J, Zainaba Fathima AL. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strengths of veneering porcelain to base metal alloy and zirconia substructures before and after aging - An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S74-81.
7. Mattiello RDL, Coelho TMK, Insaurralde E, Coelho AAK, Terra GP, Kasuya AVB, et al. A review of surface treatment methods to improve the adhesive cementation of zirconia-based ceramics. ISRN Biomaterials. 2013:1-10.
8. Machado AL, Pavarina AC. Shear bond strength of aesthetic materials bonded to Ni-Cr alloy. J Dent. 2003;31(3):205-11.
9. Komine F, Koizuka M, Fushiki R, Taguchi K, Kamio S, Matsumura H. Post-thermocycling shear bond strength of a gingiva-colored indirect composite layering material to three implant framework materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Sep;71(5):1092-100.
10. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding sand a metal-ceramic system. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec; 16 (6):635-9.
11. Kubochi K, Komine F, Fushiki R, Yagawa S, Mori S, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength of a denture base acrylic resin and gingiva-colored indirect composite material to zirconia ceramics. J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Apr;61(2): 149-57.
12. Crea.lign freestyle manual. Senden-Germany: the bredent group; 2019. available at: https://www.visiolign.com/crea- lign/.
13. Yoo JY, Yoon HI, Park JM, Park EJ. Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(5):343-8.
14. Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan; 29:295-308.
15. Kobayashi K, Komine F, Blatz MB, Saito A, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Influence of priming agents on the short-term bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic. Quintessence Int. 2009;40:545-51.
16. Su N, Yue L, Liao Y, Liu W, Zhang H, Li X, et al. The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7:214-23.
17. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17 (4):305-11.
18. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Ravishankar Y, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17 (5):420-6.
19. Hatta M, Shinya A, Yokoyama D, Gomi H, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. The effect of Surface treatment on bond strength of layering porcelain and hybrid composite bonded to zirconium dioxide ceramics. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55(3):146-53.
20. Komine F, Koizuka M, Fushiki R, Iwasaki T, Kubochi K, Matsumura H. Effect of various surface preparations on bond strength of a gingiva-colored indirect composite to zirconia framework for implant-supported prostheses. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):402-9.
21. Shimoe S, Tanoue N, Kusano K, Okazaki M, Satoda T. Influence of air-abrasion and subsequent heat treatment on bonding between zirconia framework material and indirect composites. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(5):751-7.
22. Komine F, Fushiki R, Koizuka M, Taguchi K, Kamio S, Matsumura H. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength between an indirect composite material and a zirconia framework. J Oral Sci. 2012;54(1):39-46.
23. Seimenis I, Sarafianou A, Papadopoulou H, Papadopoulos T. Shear bond strength of three veneering resins to a Ni-Cr alloy using two bonding procedures. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33 (8):600-8.
24. Ciftçi Y, Canay S, Hersek N. Shear bond strength evaluation of different veneering systems on Ni-Cr alloys. J Prosthodont. 2007; 16 (1):31-6.
25. Schwitalla AD, Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD. The impact of argon/oxygen low-pressure plasma on shear bond strength between a veneering composite and different PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2017;33(9):990-4.
26. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CH, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater. 2010;26(6):553-9.
27. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78-93.
28. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19(2): 299-308.
29. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Dentistry - Polymer- based crown and veneering materials_ (ISO/DIS Standard No. 10477:2018). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/68235.html.
30. Abrisham SM, Fallah Tafti A, Kheirkhah S, Tavakkoli MA. Shear bond strength of porcelain to a base-metal compared to zirconia core. J Dent Biomater. 2017;4(1):367-72.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zeighami S, Ghodsi S, Musapoor N. Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Composite Resin to Three Different Computer-Milled Cores After Thermocycling. J Iran Dent Assoc 2020; 32 (3 and 4) :67-74
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-2117-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 32, Issue 3 And 4 (10-2020) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645