[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 20, Issue 2 (Foll Text in Persian 2008) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2008, 20(2): 140-144 Back to browse issues page
Dental instrument sterilization status in different packing systems
Saeed Sadat-Mansuori * 1, Mahmood Ghasemi , Tanaz Amir-Behboodi , Kobra Pournasir
1- , e.mail:saeed_sadat mansouri@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (17941 Views)

Dental instrument sterilization status in different packing systems

Dr. Sadat-Mansuori S., 1 Dr. Ghasemi M., 1 Dr. Amir-Behboodi T., 2 Dr. Pournasir K.2

1Associate professor, Department of Periodontology, Islamic Azad University, Dental branch, Tehran, Iran. 2Dentist.

Abstract

Background & Aim: A thorough knowledge about the shelf life of various types of instrument packing is necessary in order to avoid unnecessary re-sterilization of dental instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shelf life of five commonly used packing systems in routine dental practice.

Materials & Methods: This experimental study was conducted with 1400 orthodontic wires. They were divided into five groups (n=280) in order to be packed by Steriperfect (St), TECNO-GAZ (TG), SOGEVA (SO), E-Line (E) and linen (L) brand materials. These packs were then stored in an active dental office environment after proper sterilization by autoclave. Forty packs of each group underwent culture test at 7 different time intervals of 0, 1, 2.5, 4.5, 7 and 9 months. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare group differences.

Results: Only 5 packs of L, 6 of St, 3 of TG, 1 of SO and 2 of E showed positive culture results at 0 month samples. Likewise positive culture results were reported for 2 of (L), 1 of (St), 2 of (TG), 3 of (SO) and 1 of (E) in the first month. No significant difference was detected among different packing materials.

Conclusion: The findings of this study support the previous findings that contamination is more of event related, not time related meaning that, sterile instrument packs remain sterile for at least 9 months unless the integrity of pack is violated.

Key words: Sterilization - Autoclave - Sterile pouch - Culture.

Corresponding Author: Dr. Sadat-Mansuori S., Department of Periodontology, Islamic Azad University, Dental branch, Tehran, Iran.

e.mail: Saeed_sadat mansouri@yahoo.com

Keywords: Sterilization, Autoclave, Sterile pouch, Culture.
Full-Text [PDF 171 kb]   (3610 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sadat-Mansuori S, Ghasemi M, Amir-Behboodi T, Pournasir K. Dental instrument sterilization status in different packing systems . J Iran Dent Assoc 2008; 20 (2) :140-144
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-343-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 2 (Foll Text in Persian 2008) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645