[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aim & Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing & Abstracting
Advertising Policy
Editorial Policies::
Peer Review Process
Section Policies
Open Access Policy
Ethical Requirements
Publication Ethics
Plagiarism Policy
Article Processing Charges (APC)
Authorship Conflicts
Intellectual Properties
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Online Submmision
Instruction to Authors
Peer review process
Publication Ethics
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 24, Issue 3 (7-2012) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2012, 24(3): 95-100 Back to browse issues page
Laboratory Assessment of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Three Different Post and Core Systems
Ladan Ranjbar Omrani1 , Esmaeil Yassini2 , Mansoreh Mirzaei1 , Mehdi Abbasi1 , Nima Baniasad3 , Hamid Kermanshah * 4
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran
3- Dentist
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran , kermanshahhamid@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (12610 Views)

  Background and Aim : Prefabricated posts are advantageous in restoring endodontically treated teeth because of their lower cost and operation time. Since selecting a suitable restoration is important in the survival of these teeth, in this study fracture resistance and the mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different post and core systems were evaluated .

  Materials and Methods : In this in vitro study, 36 human premolars were divided into three groups namely, group 1, non precious cast post and core group 2, prefabricated metal post with amalgam core group 3, FRC post and composite core. All groups received crowning. Specimens were thermocycled and loaded until definite failure. The fracture resistance and failure modes were analyzed with one way ANOVA and Fisher Exact tests .

  Results: The mean failure load for the three groups was 794, 647 and 724 N, respectively. Statistical analysis did not show any significant differences between the fracture resistance of the three experimental groups (P=0.0579). All failures in group 1, eight in group 2 and three in group 3, were unrestorable. Fisher’s Exact test showed significant difference between group 3 and the two other groups (P<0.05 ).

  Conclusion : If there is a 2-mm ferrule, the type of post and core does not have a significant effect on the fracture resistance, but it has a significant effect on the failure mode .

 
Keywords: Reconstruction, Endodontically treated teeth, Post and core, Fracture resistance
Full-Text [PDF 166 kb]   (2674 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth post, core and the finalrestoration. J Am Dent Ass. 2005May; 136 (5):611-619.
2. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the inci-dence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Pros-thet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):262-9.
3. Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulp-less teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Pros-thet Dent. 1998 Nov;80(5):527-32.
4. Soernsen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as aboutments. J of prosthet Dent. 2003 May;53(5):631-6.
5. Vire DE .Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation.J Endodont. 1991Jul; 17(7):338-42.
6. Fuss Z, Lusting J, Tames A. Prevalance of vertical root fracture in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J. 1999Aug; 32(4):283-6.
7. Salehrabi R, Rostein I. Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large patient population in the USA: An epidemiological study. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec; 30(12):846-850.
8. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship be-tween crown placement and the survival of en-dodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Mar; 87(3):256-263.
9. Sidoli G, King E, Setchell P, Derrick J. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997Jul; 78(1):5-9.
10. Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulp-less teeth restored with a cast postsand core or fiber carbon post with a composite core. J Pros-thet Dent. 1998 Nov; 80(5):527-32.
11. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F.Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000 May; 13 (spec No):15B-18B.
12. Raygot C G, Chai J, Jameson D L.Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endo-dontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthet. 2001 Mar-Apr;14(2):141-5.
13. Rosentritt M, Sikora M, Behr M, Handel G. Invitro fracture resistance and marginal adapta-tion of metallic and tooth-coloured post sys-tems. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Jul;31(7):675-81.
14. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Ounsi HF, Sadig W, Atiyeh F, Ferrari M. The effect of different full-coverage crown system on fracture re-sistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with or with-out glass fiber posts. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7): 842-846.
15. Pereira JR, De Ornelas F, Conti PC, do Valle AL. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth re-stored with prefabricated posts.2006;32:567-71.
16. Akkayan B, DMD. An invitro study evaluat-ing the effect of ferrule length on fracture re-sistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with Fiber reinforeced and zirconia dowel sys-tems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jan; 92(1):155-60.
17. McDonald A V, King P A, Setchell D. In vitro study to compare impact fracture re-sistance of intact root-treated teeth. Int Endod J. 1990 Nov; 23 (6):304-12.
18. Dean J P, Jeansonne BG, Sarker N. In vitro evaluation of carbon fiber posts. J Endod. 1998 Dec; 24 (12):807-10.
19. Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Philips KM, Junge T. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel and core sys-tems. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50.
20. Teixeira CS, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD. Bond strength of fiber posts to weakened roots after resin restoration with different light-curing times. J Endod. 2009 Jul; 35(7):1034-1039.
21. Da Silva NR, Raposo LH, Versluis A, Fer-nandes-Neto AJ, SoaresCJ. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated bovine anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Nov; 104 (5):306-317.
22. Da Silva GR, de Santios-filho PC, Simamo-to-junior PC, et al. Effect of post type and re-storative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(3):230-237.
23. Buttel L, Krastl G, Lorch H, Naumann M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R. Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance. Int En-dod J. 2009 Jan;42(1):47-53.
24. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Rِnnlِf A-M, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK, Creu-gers NHJ. In vitro fracture behaviour of maxil-lary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006 Jun; 114(3):250-6.
25. Hu Y-H, Hsu C-C, Lau Y-H. Fracture re-sistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quin-tessence Int. 2003 May;34(5):349-53.
26. Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM, Lassila LV, Kangas-niemi I, Vallittu PK. Load-bearing capacity of human incisor restored with various fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater. 2011 Jun; 27(6):107-115.
27. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, Vaudt J, Mey-er-Lueckel H, Neumann K, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic res-torations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod. 2009 Nov; 35(11):1477-1482.
28. Mangold JT, Kern M. Influence of glass-fiber posts on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with varying substance loss: an in vitro study. J Pros-thet Dent. 2011 Jun;105(6):387-93.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ranjbar Omrani L, Yassini E, Mirzaei M, Abbasi M, Baniasad N, Kermanshah H. Laboratory Assessment of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Three Different Post and Core Systems. J Iran Dent Assoc 2012; 24 (3) :95-100
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1249-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 3 (7-2012) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645