[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 27, Issue 4 (10-2015) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2015, 27(4): 182-185 Back to browse issues page
In Vitro Adhesion of Streptococcus Mutans to Polished IPS e.max and Feldspathic Porcelain
Ezatollah Jalalian1, Ghazal Mofrad *2, Mohammad Rahbar3, Afshin Mohseni4, Mahshad Mohebbi5
1- Associate Professor, Department of Fix Prosthodontics, Member of Dental Material Research Center, Dental Branch, Azad Uni-versity, Tehran, Iran
2- Dentist, MPH, University of Nevada, LV, School of Community Health Sciences, Nevada, USA , mofrad@unlv.nevada.edu
3- Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, School of Dentistry, Dental Branch, Azad University of Tehran, Iran
4- Dentist, MPH, University of Nevada, LV, School of Community Health Sciences, Nevada, USA
5- Dental Student, School of Dentistry, Dental Branch, Azad University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2654 Views)

Background and Aim: Finding appropriate dental materials with minimal adhesion and colonization of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and other pathogenic bacteria is of great importance. The aim of this study was to compare the level of adhesion of S. mutans to polished IPS e.max and feldspathic porcelain and dental enamel.

Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental study was conducted on 15 specimens in three groups (five polished IPS e.max Press blocks, five polished feldspathic porcelain blocks and five dental enamel blocks) exposed to S. mutans bacterial suspension (1×106 mg/mL). The specimens were then rinsed twice and 0.1 mL of the new suspension was cultured on blood agar. After 48 hours of storage at 37˚C, S. mutans colonies were counted by naked eye. The results were analyzed using one way ANOVA.

Results: The adhesion of S. mutans was 24.4±8.44 colonies/mm2 to the enamel, 5.6±2.35 colonies/mm2 to polished IPS e.max Press, and 5.8±1.92 colonies/mm2 to feldspathic porcelain. The difference between enamel and the other two groups in terms of adhesion of S. mutans was statistically significant (P<0.001); the two groups of ceramics were not significantly different in this regard (P=0.8).

Conclusion: The adhesion of S. mutans to the enamel was higher than that to polished IPS e.max Press and polished feldspathic porcelain.

Keywords: Streptococcus mutans, Bacterial Adhesion, Dental Porcelain
Full-Text [PDF 142 kb]   (1347 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Porosthodontics
References
1. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69.
2. Stenudd C, Nordlund A, Ryberg M, Johansson I, Källestål C, Strömberg N. The association of bacterial adhesion with dental caries. J Dent Res. 2001 Nov;80(11):2005-10.
3. Jalalian E, Mostofi SN, Shafiee E, Nourizadeh A, Nargesi RA, Ayremlou S. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to Zirconia, Titanium Al-loy and some other Restorative Materials:" An in-vitro Study". Advances in Biosciences & Clinical Medicine. 2015 Jan 1;3(2):13-20.
4. Bin AlShaibah WM, El-Shehaby FA, El-Dokky NA, Reda AR. Comparative study on the mi-crobial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep; 30 (3):206-11.
5. Hatta H, Tsuda K, Ozeki M, Kim M, Yamamoto T, Otake S, et al. Passive immunization against dental plaque formation in humans: effect of a mouth rinse containing egg yolk antibodies (IgY) specific to Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 1997 Jul 1; 31(4):268-74.
6. Pannu P, Gambhir R, Sujlana A. Correlation between the salivary Streptococcus mutans lev-els and dental caries experience in adult popula-tion of Chandigarh, India. Eur J Dent. 2013 Apr-Jun; 7 (2):191-5.
7. Freitas AB, Soares D, Fiorini JE, Swerts MS, Barros LM. In vitro effect of restorative, cementing and lining materials on Streptococcus mutans. RFO UPF. 2008 Aug;13(2):33-8.
8. Lassila LV, Garoushi S, Tanner J, Vallittu PK, Söderling E. Adherence of Streptococcus mu-tans to fiber-reinforced filling composite and conventional restorative materials. Open Dent J. 2009 Dec 4;3(1):227-32.
9. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Mar; 29 (3):257-62.
10. Shillingburg H. (1997). Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics (3rded). Chicago: Quintessence Pub.
11. Wilson M, Harvey W. Prevention of bacterial adhesion to denture acrylic. J Dent. 1989 Aug; 17 (4):166-70.
12. Passariello C, Gigola P. Adhesion and biofilm formation by oral streptococci on different commercial brackets. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jun;14(2):125-30.
13. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishingtechniques on the sur-face roughness and color change of composite resins. JProsthet Dent. 2006 Jul;96(1):33-40.
14. Kawai K, Urano M, Ebisu S. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain onadhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jun;83(6):664-7.
15. Kamala KR, Annapurni H. Evaluation of surface roughness of glazed and polished ce-ramic surface on exposure to fluoride gel, bleaching agent and aerated drink: An in vitro study. J of Indian Prosthod Soc. 2006 Jul; 6(3):128-32.
16. Motro PF, Kursoglu P, Kazazoglu E. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Oct;108(4):231-7.
17. Takatsuka T, Konishi N, Nakabo S, Hashimoto T, Torii Y, Yoshiyama M. Adhesion in vitro of oral streptococci to porcelain, composite resin cement and humanenamel. Dent Mater J. 2000 Dec;19(4):363-72.
18. Karayazgan B, Atay A, Saracli MA, Gunay Y. Evaluation of Candida albicansformation on feldspathic porcelain subjected to four surface treatment methods. Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar; 29(2): 147-53.
19. Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramicsand composites. Gen Dent. 2008 Nov-Dec;56(7):740-7.
20. Wang YN, Wen GJ, Shi B, Pan XH. [Adhesion of oral microorganisms on dental porcelain polished and glazed]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Sep;38(5):342-4.
21. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Bürgers R. Influence of saliva substitute films on initial Streptococcus mutans adhesion to enamel and dental substrata. J Dent. 2008 Dec;36(12):977-83.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jalalian E, Mofrad G, Rahbar M, Mohseni A, Mohebbi M. In Vitro Adhesion of Streptococcus Mutans to Polished IPS e.max and Feldspathic Porcelain. J Iran Dent Assoc. 2015; 27 (4) :182-185
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1814-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 4 (10-2015) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4447