|
1. Zarb GA, Schimit A. The Longitudinal clinical effectiveness of asseointegrated dental im-plants: The Toronto study. Part II. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 July;64(1):53-61. 2. Branemark PI, Albrektssont, Zarb GA. Tissue- integlated prostheses: Osseointegration in clilnical dentistry, Chicago: Quintessence; 1985;253-7. 3. Brunski JB. Biomechanics of oral implants:
Future research directions. J Dent Educ. 1988 Dec; 52(12):775-87. 4. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K,
Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for
evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jan; 81(1):7-13. 5. Brosky ME, Major RJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three -dimensional optical digitization. J Pros-thet Dent. 2003 Nov;90(5):434-40. 6. Skalak P. Biomechanical considerations in
osseintegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 June; 49(6):843-8. 7. Hsu CC, Milstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer
techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jun;69(6):588-93. 8. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A compration of the dimensional accuracy of the
spilinted and un splinted Impression techniques
for the bone-lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Jan;77(1):68-75. 9. Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A.
Comprative accuracy of implant impression
procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992; 12(2):112-21. 10. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for
osseointegrated implant supported superstruc-tures.
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):555-61. 11. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for
multiple implant abutnrent impressions. J Pros-thet Dent. 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. 12. Chio JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
Evaluation of accuracy of implant–level
impression techniques for internal connection
implant prostheses in parallel and divergent
models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):761-8. 13. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS.
Frasca LC, cervieri A. Evaluation of the accura-cy of 3 transfer techniques for implant- sup-ported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):192-8. 14. Ongül D, Gökçen-Röhlig B, Şermet B, Keskin H. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for
multiple implants. Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun; 57(2): 184-9. 15. Cerqueira NM, Ozcan M, Gonçalves M, da Ro-cha DM, Vasconcellos DK, Bottino MA, Yener-Salihoğlu E. A strain gauge analysis of mi-crostrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):341-5. 16. Avila ED, Moraes FD, Castanharo SM, Del Ac-qua MA, Mollo Junior FA. Effect of Splinting in Accuracy of Two Implant Impression
Techniques. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):633-9. 17. Lopes-Júnior I, de Lima Lucas B, Gomide HA, Gomes VL. Impression techniques for multiple implants: A photoelastic analysis. Part II:
comparison of four acrylic resins. J Oral Im-plantol. 2013 Oct;39(5):545-9.
|
