Comparison of the Effect of Three methods of Porcelain Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Porcelain

Shayegh , S.Shojaeddin; Amini , Parviz; Yaghmai , Kaveh; Massoumi , Farhood; Abbasi , Kamyar

doi:10.30699/jidai.29.72

[Home ] [Archive]

Main Menu

Journal Information

Editorial Policies

Articles archive

For Authors

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Last site contents
:: Contact Us

Volume 28, Issue 2 (4-2016)

J Iran Dent Assoc 2016, 28(2): 72-77

Back to browse issues page

Comparison of the Effect of Three methods of Porcelain Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Porcelain

S.Shojaeddin Shayegh¹

, Parviz Amini²

, Kaveh Yaghmai³

, Farhood Massoumi⁴

, Kamyar Abbasi ^*

⁵

1- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , k_abbasi@kmu.ac.ir

Abstract: (3280 Views)

Background and Aim: Several methods are available for intraoral repair of chipped porcelain restorations by composite resin. Also, there is still controversy regarding the best method of porcelain repair in terms of bond strength and cost effectiveness. This study aimed to compare three methods of porcelain surface treatment on shear bond strength (SBS) of composite to porcelain.

Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 30 porcelain blocks with a metal base in three groups. In group 1, porcelain surface was etched with hydrofluoric (HF) acid and silanized. After the application of bonding agent, several composite increments with 2mm thickness were applied on the porcelain surface. In group 2, porcelain surface was sandblasted with 50µaluminum oxide particles, etched and silanized. In group 3, grooves with 2mm length and 0.5 mm depth were created on the porcelain surface. The surface was then etched and silanized. Bonding agent and composite were then applied. The samples were then mounted in acrylic resin, stored in water for one week and subjected to thermocycling. The SBS was then measured using a universal testing machine. The SBS data were compared among the three groups using one-way ANOVA.
Results: The mean SBS was 9.13±6.09, 12.71±9.82 and 11.44±7.37 MPa in groups 1-3, respectively. No significant difference in bond strength was noted among the three groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: No significant difference exists among the three surface treatment methods evaluated in this study in terms of SBS of composite to porcelain.

Keywords: Dental Porcelain, Shear Strength, Composite Resins

Full-Text [PDF 299 kb] (1473 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original | Subject: Prosthodontics

References

1. Edelhoff D, Brix O. All-ceramic restorations in different indications: a case series. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Apr; 142 Suppl 2:14S-9S.

2. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porxelain re-pair systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jul;70(1):6-11.

3. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanharle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000 Mar; 28(3):163-177.

4. Ulusoy M, Toksavul S. Fracture resistance of five different metal framework designs for metal-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Nov-Dec; 15(6):571-574.

5. Kang MS, Ercoli C, Galindo DF, Graser GN, Moss ME, Tallents RH. Comparison of the load at failure of soldered and non-soldered porce-lain-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Sep; 90(3):235-240.

6. Michalakis KX, Stratos A, Hirayama H, Kang K, Touloumi F, Oishi Y. Fracture resistance of metal ceramic restorations with two different margin designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Sep; 102(3):172-178.

7. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct;72(4):355-9.

8. Demirel F, Muhtaroğullari M, Yüksel G, Cekiç C. Microleakage study of 3 porcelain repair materials by autoradiography. Quintessence Int. 2007 Jun;38(6):e285-90.

9. Najafi-Abrandabadi A, Najafi-Abrandabadi S, Ghasemi A, kotick PG. Microshear bond strength of composite resins to enamel and porcelain substrates utilizing unfilled versus filled resins. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Nov;11(6):636-644.

10. Chung KH, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Sep; 78(3):267-274.

11. Liu W, Fu J, Liao S, Su N, Wang H, Liao Y. Effects of different surface conditioning agents on the bond strength of resin-opaque porcelain composite. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;31(2):361-4.

12. Diaz-Arnold AM, Schneider RL, Aquilino SA. Bond strengths of intraoral porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Mar; 61(3):305-309.

13. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res. 1995 Jan; 74(1):381-387.

14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Blatz U. The effect of silica coating on the resin bond to the intaglio surface of Procera AllCeram restorations. Quintessence Int. 2003 Jul-Aug; 34(7):542-547.

15. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallitu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr; 31(2):248-255.

16. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Du-rability of the resin bond strength t zirconia ceramic after using different surface condition-ing methods. Dent Mater. 2007 Jan; 23(1):45-50.

17. Li R, Sun YC, Wang C, Gao P. Bonding of an opaque resin to silane-treated porcelain. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014 Sep;24(6):2117-25.

18. Lee Y, Kim JH, Woo JS, Yi YA, Hwang JY,Seo DG. Analysis of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Microshear Bond Strength on Leucite-Reinforced Glass-Ceramic with/without Pure Silane Primer or Universal Adhesive Sur-face Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2015 Oct; 2015: 361893.

19. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont. 1991 Jan-Feb; 4(1): 17-23.

20. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wil-werding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Aug; 76(2):119-124.

21. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effect of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil.1998 Sep; 25(9):699-705.

22. Oh WS, Shen C. Effect of surface topography on the bond strength of a composite to three different types of ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Sep; 90(3):241-246.

23. Kussano CM, Bonfante G, Batista JG, Pinto JH. Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment. Braz Dent J. 2003; 14(2)132-135.

24. Canay S, Hersek N, Etran A. Effect of different acid treatment on a porcelain surface. J Oral Rehabil 2001 Jan; 28(1):95-101.

25. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater. 1992 May; 8 (3):158-161.

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.30699/jidai.29.72

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Shayegh S, Amini P, Yaghmai K, Massoumi F, Abbasi K. Comparison of the Effect of Three methods of Porcelain Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Porcelain. J Iran Dent Assoc 2016; 28 (2) :72-77
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1859-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 28, Issue 2 (4-2016)

Back to browse issues page

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645