:: Volume 30, Issue 1 (1-2018) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2018, 30(1): 1-8 Back to browse issues page
Comparative Evaluation of microleakage of Bulk-fill and Posterior Composite Resins Using the Incremental Technique and a Liner in Cl II Restorations
Samaneh Doustfateme1 , Kazem Khosravi2 , Somayeh Hosseini * 3
1- Assistant Professor, Persian Gulf Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
2- Professor, Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , somayehoseini@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3859 Views)
Background and Aim: In recent years there has been a surge in the use of tooth-colored restorations. However, the polymerization shrinkage of these materials can form gaps, resulting in microleakage. This study aimed to compare microleakage by using different materials and techniques.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, Cl II cavities were prepared on the mesial surfaces of 60 sound human third molars. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups (n=12): Group 1 were filled with Surefil posterior composite using the oblique incremental technique. In group 2 Surefil SDR flowable composite was placed at the base of cavities followed by filling the cavity with Surefil posterior composite. Specimens in group 3 were restored only with Surefil SDR flowable composite resin in two steps, and in group 4, a layer of G-aenial Universal flow composite with 1 mm thickness was placed as the liner and the rest of the cavity filled with the Surefil posterior composite using the oblique incremental technique. Group5 benefited from snow plow technique using G-aenial Universal flow and Surefil posterior composite. Samples thermocycled and placed in 0.5% fuchsine solution for 24 hours. The teeth were evaluated under a stereomicroscope for the deepest dye penetration. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for analysis of data.
Results: The highest frequencies of scores 1 and zero were recorded in the group 5 which indicating the least microleakage in this group.
Conclusion: G-aenial Universal Flo composite resin with the snow plow technique resulted in a significant decrease in the microleakage.
Keywords: Composite Resins, Dental leakage, Dental Cavity Lining, Polymerization
Full-Text [PDF 370 kb]   (2247 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Burke FJ, Shortall AC. Successful restoration of load-bearing cavities in posterior teeth with direct-replacement resin-based composite. Dent Update. 2001 Oct;28(8):388-94.
2. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Clinical perfor-mance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater. 2011 Feb; 27(2): 150-6.
3. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin compo-site restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent. 2011 Jan; 39(1):16-25.
4. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. Dent Mater. 2014 Sep;30(9):e245-51.
5. Jain P, Belcher M. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowa-ble composite in the proximalbox. Am J Dent. 2000 Oct;13(5):235-8.
6. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007 Apr;9(2):189-94.
7. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Ef-fect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent. 2003 Aug;16(4):244-8.
8. Kubo S, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites. Am J Dent. 2004 Feb;17(1):33-7.
9. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004 May-Jun;29(3):301-8.
10. Ernst CP, Cortain G, Spohn M, Rippin G, Will-ershausen B. Marginal integrity of different res-in-based composites for posterior teeth: an in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/adhesive combina-tions with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites. Dent Mater. 2002 Jun;18(4):351-8.
11. Reddy SN, Jayashankar DN, Nainan M, Shivanna V. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restora-tions: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Jan 1; 14(1):56-60.
12. Burgess J, Cakir D. Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Con-tin Educ Dent. 2010 May;31 Spec No 2:10-5.
13. Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Co-lombo M. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: In vitro evaluation of different restorative tech-niques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Sep ;18(5):e793-8.
14. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater. 2011 Apr; 27 (4):348-55.
15. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally lay-ered resin composite. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):643-7.
16. Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):500-5.
17. Campodonico CE, Tantbirojn D, Olin PS, Versluis A. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Oct;142(10): 1176-82.
18. de Almeida JB, Platt JA, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. Three different meth-ods to evaluate microleakage of packable com-posites in Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug; 28(4):453-60.
19. Asselin ME, Fortin D, Sitbon Y, Rompré PH. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;30(1):29-33.
20. Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants ap-plied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):379-84.
21. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Winter;3(4):295-308.
22. Lotfi N, Esmaeili B, Ahmadizenouz G, Bijani A, Khadem H. Gingival microleakage in class II composite restorations using different flowable composites as liner: an in vitro evaluation. Cas-pian J Dent Res. 2015;4(1):10-6.
23. Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN. Polymerization Shrinkage and Depth of Cure of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites and Highly Filled Flowable Resin. Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):172-80.
24. Rengo C, Spagnuolo G, Ametrano G, Goracci C, Nappo A, Rengo S, et al. Marginal leakage of bulk fill composites in Class II restorations: A micro CT and digital microscope analysis. Inter J Adhe s Adhes. 2015 July;60(1):123-9.
25. Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomi-croscope. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Apr;17(2):147-54.
26. Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill compo-sites. J Dent. 2014 Apr;42(4):439-49.
27. Abdul Kader M, Altheeb A, Al-Asmry AA, Luqman M. Microleakage evaluation of class II composite restoration with incremental and bulk fill technique. J Dent Res Rev.2015;4(2):153-5.
28. Boruziniat A, Gharaee S, Sarraf Shirazi A, Majidinia S, Vatanpour M. Evaluation of the efficacy of flowable composite as lining mate-rial on microleakage of composite resin restora-tions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2016 Feb;47(2):93-101.
29. Basavanna R, Garg A, Kapur R. Evaluation of gingival microleakage of class II resin compo-site restorations with fiber inserts: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Apr;15(2):166-9.
30. Anatavara S, Sitthiseripratip K, Senawongse P. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: A finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(3):369-78.
31. Castañeda-Espinosa JC, Pereira RA, Cavalcanti AP, Mondelli RF. Transmission of composite polymerization contraction force through a flowable composite and a resin-modified glass inomer cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Dec; 15(6):495-500.
32. Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013 Aug;29(8):835-41.
33. Cadenaro M, Marchesi G, Antoniolli F, Davidson C, De Stefano Dorigo E, Breschi L. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater. 2009 May;25(5):649-54.
34. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Jun 4;15(3):176-84.
35. Campos PE, Barceleiro Mde O, Sampaio- Filho HR, Martins LR. Evaluation of the cervi-cal integrity during occlusal loading of class2 restorations. Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):59-64.



XML     Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 30, Issue 1 (1-2018) Back to browse issues page