:: Volume 33, Issue 3 And 4 (10-2021) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2021, 33(3 And 4): 44-50 Back to browse issues page
CBCT Evaluation of the Position of Palatal Neurovascular Bundle and the Greater Palatine Foramen in an Iranian Population
Mehrdokht sadat Safavi1, Maryam Tehranchi2 , Shahriar Shahab3 , Saeed Mahdipour Ganji4, Ferial Taleghani * 5
1- Dentist, Private Office, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
4- Periodontist, Private Office, Tehran, Iran
5- Associated Professor, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1770 Views)
Background and Aim: Traumatization of the palatal neurovascular bundle (NVB) is a potential complication of soft tissue graft harvesting from the palate. Thus, it is imper-ative to have adequate knowledge about the position and path of the NVB. This study assessed the position of palatal NVB and the greater palatine foramen (GPF) in an Ira-nian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated CBCT scans of 128 patients. The position of the GPF relative to molar teeth, the distance be-tween the depth of NVB and the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of canine to second molar teeth, and the distance between the GPF and the alveolar ridge, the poste-rior nasal spine (PNS), and the median maxillary suture (MMS) were all assessed. Statistical analysis was performed by the Chi-square test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and ANOVA. Results: In 64% of the cases, the GPF was located close to the apex of the third molar in both females (49.4%) and males (50.6%), irrespective of age. The mean dis-tance between the depth of the NVB and the CEJ of the canine to second molar teeth was 9.56, 12.36, 14.69, 14.98 and 16.01 mm, respectively. The mean distance between the GPF and the alveolar ridge, PNS, and MMS in edentulous patients was 2.23±0.65, 16.88±1.19, and 15.89±1.20 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Third molar is the best anatomical landmark to determine the position of the GPF. The distance between the palatal NVB and the CEJ increases from the anterior towards the posterior region.
Keywords: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Connective Tissue, Palate, Alveolar Process
Full-Text [PDF 699 kb]   (439 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Periodontology
1. Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects? J Dent. 2008 Sep;36(9):659-71.
2. Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41: S123-42.
3. Langer B, Calagna L. The subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Oct;44(4):363-7.
4. Langer B, Calagna LJ. The subepithelial connective tissue graft. A new approach to the enhancement of anterior cosmetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1982;2(2):22-33.
5. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tis-sue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985 Dec;56(12):715-20.
6. Yilmaz HG, Ayali A. Evaluation of the neurovascular bundle position at the palate with cone beam computed tomography: an observational study. Head Face Med. 2015 Dec; 11(1):1-5.
7. Reiser GM, Bruno JF, Mahan PE, Larkin LH. The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal do-nor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Apr;16(2):130-7.
8. Tomaszewska IM, Tomaszewski KA, Kmiotek EK, Pena IZ, Urbanik A, Nowakowski M, et al. Anatomical landmarks for the localization of the greater palatine foramen--a study of 1200 head CTs, 150 dry skulls, systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. J Anat. 2014 Oct; 225(4):419-35.
9. Wang TM, Kuo KJ, Shih C, Ho LL, Liu JC. Assessment of the relative locations of the greater palatine foramen in adult Chinese skulls. Acta Anat (Basel). 1988;132(3):182-6.
10. Yilmaz HG, Boke F, Ayali A. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 May;42(5):458-61.
11. Aoun G, Nasseh I, Sokhn S, Saadeh M. Analysis of the greater palatine foramen in a Lebanese population using cone-beam computed tomography technology. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Dec;5(Suppl 2): S82-8.
12. Ikuta CR, Cardoso CL, Ferreira-Júnior O, Lauris JR, Souza PH, Rubira-Bullen IR. Position of the greater palatine foramen: an anatomical study through cone beam computed tomography images. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 Nov;35(9):837-42.
13. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL, Faber J, Bezerra AC. A new method to assess and meas-ure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Jul;36(7):564-8.
14. Methathrathip D, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Lertsirithong A, Ariyawatkul T, Sangvichien S. Anatomy of greater palatine foramen and canal and pterygopalatine fossa in Thais: considerations for maxillary nerve block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005 Dec;27(6):511-6.
15. Klosek SK, Rungruang T. Anatomical study of the greater palatine artery and related structures of the palatal vault: considerations for palate as the subepithelial connective tissue graft donor site. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Apr; 31 (4):245-50.
16. Fu JH, Hasso DG, Yeh CY, Leong DJ, Chan HL, Wang HL. The accuracy of identifying the greater palatine neurovascular bundle: a cadaver study. J Periodontol. 2011 Jul;82(7):1000-6.
17. Yu SK, Lee MH, Park BS, Jeon YH, Chung YY, Kim HJ. Topographical relationship of the greater palatine artery and the palatal spine. Sig-nificance for periodontal surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Sep;41(9):908-13.

XML     Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 33, Issue 3 And 4 (10-2021) Back to browse issues page