Effect of Dentin Surface Treatment Using a Non-Thermal 
Argon Plasma Brush on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive 
Resin Composite

Moradi, Aida; Hasani Tabatabaei , Masumeh; Hashemi Kamangar , Sedighe; Valizadeh, Sara

doi:10.30699/jidai.31.1.1

[Home ] [Archive]

Main Menu

Journal Information

Editorial Policies

Articles archive

For Authors

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Last site contents
:: Contact Us

Volume 31, Issue 1 (1-2019)

J Iran Dent Assoc 2019, 31(1): 1-7

Back to browse issues page

Effect of Dentin Surface Treatment Using a Non-Thermal Argon Plasma Brush on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Composite

Aida Moradi¹

, Masumeh Hasani Tabatabaei²

, Sedighe Hashemi Kamangar²

, Sara Valizadeh ^*

1- Postgraduate Student, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Laser Research Center in Dentistry, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Teh-ran, Iran AND Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , valizadeh_s@sina.tums.ac.ir

Abstract: (3556 Views)

Background and Aim: Improving the bond strength at the resin-dentin interface is an important challenge in adhesive dentistry. This study examined the effect of low-power, non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NT-APP) treatments on the adhesion of a self-adhesive resin composite to dentin.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental in-vitro study, buccal enamel of extracted bovine incisors was removed using a high-speed diamond bur. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups according to the plasma treatment and thermocy-cling. The non-thermal atmospheric argon plasma brush was used in this study. One subgroup was subjected to the microshear bond strength (µSBS) test after 24 hours, whereas the other subgroup was subjected to artificial aging with thermocycling for 5000 cycles before being tested. Each specimen was attached to a testing jig and loaded at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute in a universal testing machine until failure occurred. Data were analyzed using two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Results: The results of μSBS testing showed that with plasma treatment, the average μSBS increased to 34.20±12.12 MPa compared to 19.47±7.4 MPa in the controls (P=0.002). After 5000 cycles of thermocycling, the adhesive-dentin bonding strengths of the plasma-treated specimens slightly decreased from 34.20±12.12 MPa to 33.64±5.6 MPa (P=0.886), while the strengths of the untreated specimens reduced from 19.47±7.4 MPa to 19.10±5.1 MPa (P=0.461). Plasma treatment improved the µSBS compared to the control group. After thermocycling, the µSBS did not decrease in the plasma and control (non-plasma) groups.
Conclusion: Plasma treatment using NT-APP improves the adhesion of self-adhesive flowable resin composites to dentin.

Keywords: Composite Resins, Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma, Dental Bonding

Full-Text [PDF 386 kb] (1689 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original | Subject: Restorative Dentistry

References

1. Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NH. Minimally invasive manage-ment of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Jun;142(6):612-20.

2. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005 Feb; 84(2):118-32.

3. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Chung I, Pashley DH, Campbell JA, Laffoon JE, et al. Resin-dentin interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile dentin bond strength after five-year water stor-age. Oper Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):705-12.

4. Fridman G, Friedman G, Gutsol A, Shekhter AB, Vasilets VN, Fridman A. Applied plasma medicine. Plasma Process Polym. 2008 Aug; 5(6): 503-33.

5. Kim JH, Lee MA, Han GJ, Cho BH. Plasma in dentistry: a review of basic concepts and applications in dentistry. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Jan;72(1):1-12.

6. Cheruthazhekatt S, Černák M, Slavíček P, Havel J. Gas plasmas and plasma modified materials in medicine. J Appl Biomed. 2010 Jan;8(2):55-66.

7. Shohet JL. Plasma-aided manufacturing. IEEE T Plasma Sci. 1991 Oct;19(5):725-33.

8. Yasuda H. Luminous Chemical Vapor Deposition and Interface Engineering. Florida, Bota Racon, USA, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2004:11-40.

9. Yu QS, Li H, Ritts AC, Yang B, Chen M, Hong L, et al. Non-thermal atmospheric plasma treatment for deactivation of oral bacteria and improvement of dental composite restoration. In Plasma for Bio-Decontamination, Medicine and Food Security. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology, 2012: 215-228.

10. Ritts AC, Li H, Yu Q, Xu C, Yao X, Hong L, et al. Dentin surface treatment using a non‐thermal argon plasma brush for interfacial bonding improvement in composite restoration. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Oct;118(5):510-6.

11. Zhu XM, Zhou JF, Guo H, Zhang XF, Liu XQ, Li HP, et al. Effects of a modified cold atmospheric plasma jet treatment on resin-dentin bonding. Dent Mater J. 2018 Sep 30;37(5):798-804.

12. Deng D, Huang X, Huang C, Yang T, Du X, Wang Y, et al. Effects of chlorhexidine on bonding durability of different adhesive sys-tems using a novel thermocycling method. Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58(2):148-55.

13. Perdigão J, Fundingsland JW, Duarte S Jr, Lopes M. Microtensile adhesion of sealants to intact enamel. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Sep; 15 (5):342-8.

14. Zhang Y, Yu Q, Wang Y. Non-thermal atmospheric plasmas in dental restoration: improved resin adhesive penetration. J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):1033-42.

15. Bahrololoomi Z, Soleymani A, Heydari Z. In vitro comparison of microleakage of two mate-rials used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect. 2011 Summer;5(3):83-86.

16. Lehmann A, Rueppell A, Schindler A, Zylla IM, Seifert HJ, Nothdurft F, et al. Modification of enamel and dentin surfaces by non‐thermal atmospheric plasma. Plasma Process Polym. 2013 Mar;10(3):262-70.

17. Dong X, Ritts AC, Staller C, Yu Q, Chen M, Wang Y. Evaluation of plasma treatment effects on improving adhesive-dentin bonding by using the same tooth controls and varying cross‐sectional surface areas. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Aug; 121(4): 355-62.

18. Teixeira HS, Coelho PG, Duarte S, Janal MN, Silva N, Thompson VP. Influence of atmos-pheric pressure plasma treatment on mechanical proprieties of enamel and sealant bond strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015 Jul; 103(5):1082-91.

19. Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Ad-hesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:72-80.

20. Brueckner C, Schneider H, Haak R. Shear bond strength and tooth-composite interaction with self-adhering flowable composites. Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):90-100.

21. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):221-30.

22. Ayres AP, Freitas PH, De Munck J, Vananroye A, Clasen C, Dias CDS, et al. Benefits of Nonthermal Atmospheric Plasma Treatment on Dentin Adhesion. Oper Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec; 43 (6):E288-E299.

23. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3; 8(1):1-17.

24. Marine J, Myers CP, Picquet GA, Zaidel LA, Wu D, Uhrich KE. Reduction of bacterial attachment on hydroxyapatite surfaces: Using hydrophobicity and chemical functionality to enhance surface retention and prevent attach-ment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018 Jul 1;167:531-537.

25. Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A. Bond-ing performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology. 2018 Apr;106(2):171-180.

26. Erli HJ, Marx R, Paar O, Niethard FU, Weber M, Wirtz DC. Surface pretreatments for medical application of adhesion. Biomed Eng Online. 2003 Sep 18;2:15.

27. Makishi P, Pacheco RR, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J, et al. Assessment of self-adhesive resin composites: nondestructive imag-ing of resin-dentin interfacial adaptation and shear bond strength. Microsc Microanal. 2015 Dec; 21 (6):1523-1529.

28. Fu J, Kakuda S, Pan F, Hoshika S, Ting S, Fukuoka A, et al. Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in-one system on dentin. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):203-11.

29. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable compo-site resin in class I restorations. Clin Oral Inves-tig. 2013 Jul;17(6):1497-506.

30. Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self- adhering flowable resin composite. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):609-17.

31. Veli I, Akin M, Kucukyilmaz E, Uysal T. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable com-posite when used for lingual retainer bonding J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Sep;75(5):374-83.

32. Bektas OO, Eren D, Akin EG, Akin H. Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable compo-site in terms of micro-shear bond strength and microleakage. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul; 71(3-4):541-6.

33. Han GJ, Kim JH, Chung SN, Chun BH, Kim CK, Seo DG, et al. Effects of non‐thermal atmospheric pressure pulsed plasma on the adhesion and durability of resin composite to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2014 Dec;122(6):417-23.

34. Huang C, Yu Q, Hsieh FH, Duan Y. Bacterial deactivation using a low temperature argon atmospheric plasma brush with oxygen addi-tion. Plasma Process Polym. 2007 Jan;4(1):77-87.

35. Naga AA, Yousef M, Ramadan R, Fayez Bahgat S, Alshawwa L. Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage? Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Mar 27;7:55-64.

36. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, et al. From dry bond-ing to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bond-ing. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent. 2007 Feb;20(1):7-20.

37. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005 Oct; 21(10): 895-910.

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.30699/jidai.31.1.1

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Moradi A, Hasani Tabatabaei M, Hashemi Kamangar S, Valizadeh S. Effect of Dentin Surface Treatment Using a Non-Thermal Argon Plasma Brush on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Composite . J Iran Dent Assoc 2019; 31 (1) :1-7
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-2000-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 31, Issue 1 (1-2019)

Back to browse issues page

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645