[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aim & Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing & Abstracting
Advertising Policy
Editorial Policies::
Peer Review Process
Section Policies
Open Access Policy
Ethical Requirements
Publication Ethics
Plagiarism Policy
Article Processing Charges (APC)
Authorship Conflicts
Intellectual Properties
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Online Submmision
Instruction to Authors
Peer review process
Publication Ethics
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 31, Issue 1 (1-2019) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2019, 31(1): 14-20 Back to browse issues page
Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss Following Immediate and Delayed Implantation
Sara Khazaei1 , Arash Shisheian1 , Samaneh Abbasi1 , Farnoush Fotovat1 , Banafshe Poormoradi2 , Sara Alijani * 3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , alijani_sara@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (2907 Views)
Background and Aim: Intraosseous implants can be placed using three different techniques: immediate, early, and delayed. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in the marginal bone level around implants after immediate and delayed im-plant placement.
Materials and Methods: In the present prospective cohort study, 26 implants were placed in 26 patients divided into two groups. In group 1, 13 implants were placed immediately, while in group 2, 13 implants were placed with a delay of more than 4 months after tooth extraction. The marginal bone level was measured on periapical radiographs taken using the parallel technique at implant placement time and 6 and 12 months after implantation. The measurements were made using a digital caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm, and the data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mauchly's sphericity test. The statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
Results: The mean distances between the crestal bone and the implant shoulder in group 1 were 1.12 mm, 1.48 mm, and 1.77 mm at implant placement time and 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. In group 2, these distances were 1.26 mm, 1.46 mm, and 1.71 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences in marginal bone resorption between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in crestal bone loss around implants placed with immediate and delayed techniques.
Keywords: Endosseous Dental Implantation, Immediate Dental Implant Loading, Alveolar Bone Loss
Full-Text [PDF 162 kb]   (1306 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Orthodontics
References
1. Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2015:1053-65.
2. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Iacovazzi L, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Immediate, early, and late im-plant placement in first-molar sites: a retrospec-tive case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep- Oct;26(5):1108-22.
3. Barzilay I, Graser GN, Iranpour B, Natiella JR. Immediate implantation of a pure titanium im-plant into an extraction socket: report of a pilot procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Fall; 6(3):277-84.
4. Barone A, Marconcini S, Giammarinaro E, Mijiritsky E, Gelpi F, Covani U. Clinical Outcomes of Implants Placed in Extraction Sockets and Immediately Restored: A 7-Year Single-Cohort Prospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1103-1112.
5. Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, et al. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized con-trolled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb; 44(2): 215-224.
6. Crespi R, Capparé P, Crespi G, Lo Giudice G, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E. Immediate Implant Placement in Sockets with Asymptomatic Api-cal Periodontitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):20-27.
7. Grunder U. Immediate functional loading of immediate implants in edentulous arches: two-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Dec;21(6):545-51.
8. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Bone Healing Following Immediate Versus Delayed Placement of Titanium Implants into Extraction Sockets: A Prospective Clinical Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Mar-Apr;18(2):189-99.
9. Shahidi P, Jacobson Z, Dibart S, Pourati J, Nunn ME, Barouch K, et al. Efficacy of a new papilla generation technique in implant dentistry: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im-plants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):926-34.
10. Orenstein IH, Petrazzuolo V, Morris HF, Ochi S. Variables affecting survival of single-tooth hydroxyapatite-coated implants in anterior maxillae at 3 years. Ann Periodontol. 2000 Dec; 5 (1):68-78.
11. Khoshhal M, Vafaei F, Poormoradi B, Moradi Haghgoo J, Behgozin F, Amiri N, et al. Comparative evaluation of marginal bone level change in delayed and early implant placement. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2016 Mar;8(1):e24673.
12. Taylor RC, McGlumphy EA, Tatakis DN, Beck FM. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of single-tooth Biolok implants: A 5-year study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):849-54.
13. Rosenstiel SF, Land M. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2016:334.
14. Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, Storelli S, Rozza R, Chiapasco M. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations: 1-year prospective study. J Periodontol. 2008 Jun;79(6):1048-55.
15. Pikner SS, Grondahl K. Radiographic analyses of "advanced" marginal bone loss around Brånemark dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Jun;11(2):120-33.
16. Soydan SS, Cubuk S, Oguz Y, Uckan S. Are success and survival rates of early implant placement higher than immediate implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr; 42 (4):511-5.
17. Sasi Kumar PK, Ravikumar A, Elavarasu S, Kumaran T, Murugan B. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate and Delayed Single-tooth Implant Placement: An 18-month Follow-up Study. J Periodontol Im-plant Dent. 2013;5(2):41-54.
18. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goené R, Hatano N, Henry P, Jackson WJ, et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Mar-Apr;14(2):210-6.
19. Block MS, Mercante DE, Lirette D, Mohamed W, Ryser M, Castellon P. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov; 67 (11 Suppl):89-107.
20. Barone A, Toti P, Quaranta A, Derchi G, Govani U. The Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Versus Delayed Restoration Procedures on Immediate Implants: A Comparative Cohort Study for Single-Tooth Replacement. Clin Im-plant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1114-26.
21. Sunitha RV, Ramakrishnan T, Kumar S, Emmadi P. Soft tissue preservation and crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34(4):223-9.
22. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, et al. Osseointe-grated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted No-belpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988 May;59(5):287-96.
23. Agliardi E, Panigatti S, Clerico M, Villa C, Malo P. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):459-65.
24. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Gehrke P, Felice P, Carinci F. Five-year outcome of 111 immediate nonfunctional single restorations. J Oral Implan-tol. 2006;32(6):277-85.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khazaei S, Shisheian A, Abbasi S, Fotovat F, Poormoradi B, Alijani S. Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss Following Immediate and Delayed Implantation . J Iran Dent Assoc 2019; 31 (1) :14-20
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-2002-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 31, Issue 1 (1-2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645