1. Andrews WA. AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white
females. Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):662-9. 2. Dorsey J, Korabik K. Social and psychological motivations for orthodontic treatment. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1977 Oct;72(4):460. 3. Gosney MB. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1986 Apr;13(2):87-94. 4. Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for
orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1981;3(3):151-62. 5. Bowman SJ. More than lip service: facial
esthetics in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Aug;130(8):1173-81. 6. Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL.
Orthodontic diagnosis: the problem-oriented
approach, in Proffit W, Fields H (editors).
Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis, Mis-souri,
Mosby Co., 2013:164. 7. Sena LMF, Damasceno E Araújo LAL, Farias ACR, Pereira HSG. The influence of sagittal
position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-86. 8. Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic
evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Sep;104(3):240-50. 9. Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile
preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jul;114(1):1-7. 10. Maganzini AL, Tseng JY, Epstein JZ.
Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital image-ry techniques. Angle Orthod. 2000 Oct;70(5):393-9. 11. Lew KK, Soh G, Loh E. Ranking of facial
profiles among Asians. J Esthet Dent. 1992 Jul-Aug;4(4):128-30. 12. Polk MS Jr, Farman AG, Yancey JA, Gholston LR, Johnson BE, Regennitter FJ. Soft tissue profile: a
survey of African-American preference. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108 (1):90-101. 13. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):464-71. 14. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14(4):291-5. 15. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. A comparative as-sessment of the perception of Chinese facial
profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop. 2005 Jun;127(6):692-9. 16. Cox NH, van der Linden FP. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod. 1971 Aug;60(2):175-83. 17. Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics
and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1978 Jun; 73 (6):648-57. 18. Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of
facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1990 Nov;17(4): 299-304. 19. Maxwell R, Kiyak HA. Dentofacial
appearance: a comparison of patient self-assessment techniques. Int J Adult Orthodon
Orthognath Surg. 1991;6(2):123-31. 20. Phillips C, Griffin T, Bennett E. Perception of
facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and
professionals. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10(2):127-35. 21. Thareja V, Shivaprakash G, Shamnur N,
Kumar GA. An Appraisal of Indian Profile
Attractiveness using Digital Image Morphing. J
Ind Orthod Soc. 2012;46(1):9-16. 22. Maple JR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Larsen PE, Shanker S. A comparison of providers’ and
consumers’ perceptions of facial-profile
attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):690-6. 23. Sarver DM, Proffit W, Ackerman JL.
Evaluation of Facial Soft Tissues, in Proffit WR, White RP, Sarver DM (editors). Contempo-rary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity. St. Louis, Missouri, Mosby Co., 2003:115. 24. Montgomery DC. Experiments with a Single Factor: The Analysis of Variance, in Design and Analysis of Experiments. Hoboken, New Jer-sey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2017:69-78. 25. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. Professional
assessment of facial profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):201-5. 26. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. An Asian
community's perspective on facial profile
attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemi-ol.
2007 Feb;35(1):18-24. 27. de Almeida MD, Farias ACR, Bittencourt MAV. Influence of mandibular sagittal position on fa-cial esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):87-96. 28. Shelly AD, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Fridrich KL, et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular
advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jun;117(6):630-7. 29. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Cobourne MT, McDonald F. Assessing the influence of
mandibular prominence on perceived attrac-tiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and
layperson. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):738-46. 30. Sawant AA, Mani SA. Facial Profile
Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists’ and Other Dental Specialists Ranking of Treated
Profiles with the Twin Block Appliances. Iran J Or-tho. 2014 Dec;9(3): e3748. 31. Türkkahraman H, Gökalp H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish
population. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):640-7. 32. Trehan M, Naqvi ZA, Sharma S. Perception of facial profile: How you feel about yourself. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Aug;4(2):109-111. 33. Jarungidanan P, Sorathesn K. Acceptable facial profiles in Thai non-straight profile patients. CU Dent J. 2008; 31:235-48. 34. Coleman GG, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B, Best AM. Influence of chin prominence on
esthetic lip profile preferences. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):36-42. 35. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial
attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec; 3(12): 452-460.
|