Submitted: 02 Aug 2011
Accepted: 23 Feb 2013
ePublished: 23 Feb 2013
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2011;23(2): 116-124.
  Abstract View: 25

Research

The detection of early inter proximal caries: DIAGNOdent, conventional and digital radiography

Masoumeh Hasani-Tabatabaee, Nafiseh Momeni*, Azam Khorshidian
*Corresponding Author: Email: nafisehmomeni@yahoo.com

Abstract

 The detection of early inter proximal caries: DIAGNOdent, conventional and digital radiography

 

  Dr. Hasani- Tabatabaee M ., 1 Dr. Momeni SN ., 2 Dr. Khorshidian A . 2

  1 Associate P rofessor, Department of Operative Dentistry , School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran. 2 Dentist, Member of Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran .

  

  (Received 3 March, 2010 Accepted 14 April, 2011)

  

  Abstract

  

  Background and Aim : Detection of caries in early stages is necessary for prevention and conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of laser fluorescence (LF) using DIAGNOdent pen and to compare it with conventional Bite-Wing (BW) and Digital Radiography (DR).

  Materials and Methods : In this survey, eighty extracted molars and premolars were mounted in stone blocks to simulate contact points. Proximal surfaces of each tooth were examined with LF. The teeth were also diagnosed using BW and digital radiography. After these procedures, the teeth were histologically prepared and assessed for caries extension as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were calculated for each diagnostic system in comparison with the gold standard. Cut-off points were calculated with ROC analysis. Comparisons between the accuracy of methods were performed using McNemar test.

  Results : At dentinal caries, LF had the highest sensitivity and specificity (0.82 and 0.84, respectively). For detection of early inter proximal caries, the sensitivity of LF (0.74) and specificity of DR (0.95) were the highest. The LF positive predictive values were the least and negative predictive values were the most. There was no significant difference between conventional and digital radiography in the detection of interproximal caries.

  Conclusion : DIAGNOdent might be a useful additional tool in detecting early interproximal caries, but due to the false positive responses at decision making for restorative treatments, auxiliary methods should be used.

 Key words: Lasers – Fluorescence – Dental caries – Bitewing radiography

  

  Corresponding Author: Dr. Momeni SN . , Dentist, Member of Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran .

  e.mail: nafisehmomeni@yahoo.com

 

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 26

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.