Submitted: 01 Jul 2014
Accepted: 01 Jul 2014
ePublished: 01 Jul 2014
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2014;26(3): 158-162.
  Abstract View: 22

Original

Effect of Thickness of Zirconia Core on Marginal Adaptation of All-Ceramic Restorations

Ezatollah Jalalian, Mona Sadegh*, Sedighe Masoomi, Shahriar Jalalian, Aida Evazi Ziyaei
*Corresponding Author: Email: moona851@yahoo.com

Abstract

  Background and Aim : Marginal adaptation is important for long-term Successof full-coverage restorations. Thickness of core is one of the important factors influencing the marginal integrity.Thus, the aim of this studywas to evaluate the effect of different thicknesses of zirconia core on marginal adaptation of all-ceramic restorations .

  Materials and Methods : In this single blind in vitro study,a standard brass die7 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter was prepared with a classic chamfer finish line with 0.8 mm depthand 10 degrees of wall taper. Copings were made using the CAD / CAM system. We had three groupsof10 samples each.Group 1 with a zirconia thickness of 3.0 mm, group 2 with a thickness of 0.5 mm and group 3 with a thickness of 0.7 mm. Copings were then placed on the die and randomly numbered. The vertical gap in the margin was measured at 10 points using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were collected. The mean and standard deviation values were calculated and ANOVA. was used for the comparison of the three groups. Tukey’s test was also applied .

  Results : The gap in 0.3,0.5 and 0.7 mm thicknesses of zirconia before porcelain firing was 89.21± 28.90, 79.55 ± 39.32 and 40.813 ± 10.3 µ, respectively.The difference in marginal gap between the three groups was statistically significant (p=0.001).Tukey’s test failed to find a significant difference in marginal gap between 0.3 and 0.5 mm thicknesses (p=0.006). But, the difference between 0.3 and 0.7 mm (p=0.001) and also 0.5 and 0.7mm (p=0.001) was statistically significant .

  Conclusion Based on the results, by increasing the thickness of the zirconia core marginal gap decreases in all ceramic restorations .

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 23

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.