Submitted: 18 Oct 2020
Accepted: 20 Jan 2020
ePublished: 20 Jan 2020
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2020;32(1): 1-7.
  Abstract View: 21

Original

Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted with Different Resin Cements

Ehsan Ghasemi ORCID logo, Navid Haghayegh, Fatemeh Salehi Ghalesefid* ORCID logo
*Corresponding Author: Email: Salehifa.1991@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and Aim: Dislodgment of prosthetic crowns is a common occurrence. In such cases, recementation is a suitable treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the retention in cementation and recementation using different resin ce-ments.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 40 premolars were se-lected (n=10). They were standardized relative to some properties and then the wax patterns were prepared and cast. After 24 h, all specimens were decemented using In-stron universal testing machine. The castings were then re-cemented and stored under the same conditions. After 24 h, the cemented copings were dislodged, and the separa-tion load was recorded.
Results: The highest and the lowest mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 and Maxcem cements in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. Paired sample t-test showed a significant difference in the retention of G-CEM group between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.009). The two-factorial repeated measures ANOVA showed the significant effect of cement type on retention (P=0.009), and there was a significant difference in retention between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.006). The Tukey’s HSD test re-vealed a significant difference in retentive strength between the Maxcem and Panavia F2 (P=0.011). The lowest mean difference was observed between Bifix SE and Maxcem groups (-16.75 kgf, P=0.89).
Conclusion: The maximum and minimum mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 cement and Maxcem in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the initial cementation and recementation in G-CEM group.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 22

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.