Submitted: 02 Aug 2011
Accepted: 23 Feb 2013
ePublished: 23 Feb 2013
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2011;23(2): 87-94.
  Abstract View: 24

Research

Influence of surface treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia

Esmaeil Yassini, Hamid Kermanshah, Maede Sedaghati*
*Corresponding Author: Email: Maedeh78@gmail.com

Abstract

  Influence of surface treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia

 

  Dr. Yassini E.,1 Dr. Kermanshah H ., 2 Dr. Sedaghati M. 3

  1 Professor , Department of Restorative Dentistry , School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran . 2 Assistant Professor , Department of Restorative Dentistry , School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran . 3 Specialist in Restorative Dentistry, Tehran, Iran.

 

 

  (Received 26 May, 2010 Accepted 12 Jan, 2011)

 

  Abstract

 

  Background and Aim: Different alternative surface treatments, which have not been fully investigated, have been suggested to improve bonding to zirconia. The aim of this study was to compare microtensile bond strength of self- adhesive resin luting cements to zirconia following different surface treatments.

  Materials and Methods: Three blocks of zirconia (Cercon, Degussa, Germany) and three composite blocks (Z100, 3M, ESPE, USA) with 11×11×5 mm dimension were made. The blocks were divided into three groups. The ceramic blocks were cemented to the composite blocks using G-Cem (GC, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. All samples were stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 hours and later sectioned in two axes using diamond disk to obtain bar shape specimens with a cross-sectional area of approximately 1mm2 and 10mm long (n=12). Specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 72 hours and thermocycled for 2000 cycles (5°C/55°C). Each specimen was then attached to a microtensile test device. Bond strength was measured with crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Failure modes were examined under stereomicroscope (×40). Representative specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bond strength data were analyzed with one way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05).

  Results: Alloy Primer subgroup (49.64±7.02) had a significantly higher bond strength than silane (42.12±4.2) and silicoating with silanopen (21.78±4.7) (p<0.0001). Silanopen had the lowest bond strength in this group.

  SEM observation indicate that ceramic surface in silanopen group had fewer irregularities.

  Conclusion: Primers containing MDP functional monomer like Alloy Primer affect the durability of self adhesive resin cement (G-Cem) bond strength to zirconia.

 Key words: Zirconia – Bond strength – Resin cements – Surface treatments

 

  Corresponding Author: Dr. Sedaghati M., Specialist in Restorative Dentistry, Tehran, Iran.

  e.mail: Maedeh78@gmail.com

 

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 25

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.