Submitted: 14 Nov 2007
Accepted: 25 Feb 2013
ePublished: 25 Feb 2013
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2007;19(2): 49-55.
  Abstract View: 27

Research

The evaluation of compressive strength in three brands of zinc phosphate cement in two different powder/liquid ratios

Mahasti Sahabi*, Negar Homayunfar
*Corresponding Author: Email: mahsahabi@yahoo.com

Abstract

The evaluation of compressive strength in three brands of zinc phosphate cement in two different powder/liquid ratios

Dr. M. Sahabi * - Dr. N. Homayunfar **

* Assistant Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

** Assistant Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics Dept. Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences.

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the compressive strength of 3 brands of Zinc Phosphate Cements determining the influences of eye estimated (rough measurement) of powder/liquid ratios on the compressive strengths of these cements.

Materials and Methods: The three tested Zinc phosphate cements were Hoffmann's [Harvard Dental GmbH], DeTrey Zinc [Densply] and Ariadent [Asia Cherri Teb]. The specimens were divided into 6 groups, each one containing 10 samples. These samples were prepared according to ISO 9917 (2003) and stored in distilled water at the temperature of 37 ºC for 24 hours. The compressive strengths of samples were measured with the Zwick testing machine. The ANOVA and Tukey statistical tests were used to identify the significant differences between these groups.

Results: There were significant differences between compressive strengths of cements prepared with manufacturer suggested mixing ratios and clinically used (eye estimated) ratios. The least compressive strength was recorded for Ariadent samples with clinical mixing ratio and the highest was recorded for Hoffmann's samples with manufacturer’s suggested ratio.

Conclusion: In clinically used ratios, Hoffmann's cement had the highest compressive strength. The differences between the strengths of manufacturer suggested mixing ratios and clinically used ones were the most in DeTrey Zinc cement.

Key words: Zinc phosphate cement – Compressive strength – Powder / liquid ratio

Correspondence Author: Fixed Prosthodontics Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. e.mail:masahabi@yahoo.com

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 28

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.