Logo-jida

Submitted: 16 May 2022
Accepted: 26 Sep 2022
ePublished: 04 Jan 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2022;34(3-4): 76-82.
doi: 10.34172/jida.A-10-1-985
  Abstract View: 372
  PDF Download: 214

Original Article

Comparing antimicrobial effect of cupral and calcium hydroxide paste with electrophoresis in apical part of root canals blocked by separated instrument

Mohsen Aminsobhani 1 ORCID logo, Mohammad Ali Ketabi 2 ORCID logo, Mohammad Soleimani 3 ORCID logo, Armin Zareian 4 ORCID logo, Behnam Baharlou 5 ORCID logo, Elaheh Azizlou 6* ORCID logo

1 Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Microbiology School of Medicine Infectious Diseases Research Center AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor of Nursing Education School of Nursing, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Dentist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
6 Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Elaheh Azizlou, Email: aelahe66@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: This study compared the antimicrobial effect of electrophoresis with calcium hydroxide and electrophoresis with cupral paste in the apical area blocked by the separated instrument.

Materials and Methods: A total of 72 single-rooted human teeth were involved in the study, each decoronated to a length of 15 mm. Following the determination of the working length and root canal preparation, the teeth were autoclaved and subsequently infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Intentional fracture of a rotary instrument occurred 3mm above the apical terminus of the canal. The samples were then randomly assigned to six groups: Groups G1 and G2 received Cupral paste (Humanchemie GmbH, Germany) and calcium hydroxide paste (Humanchemie GmbH, Germany), respectively, with the application of electric current. In G3, sterile normal saline was used with electrophoresis. For G4 and G5, Cupral and calcium hydroxide pastes were applied to the root canal without electrical current, respectively. G6 was used as the positive control. Following all interventions, the 3mm apical segment of the specimens was removed, and the antimicrobial effect was assessed by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) in this canal area.

Results: Cupral paste, Cupral paste with electrophoresis, and calcium hydroxide with electrophoresis demonstrated a significant reduction in bacteria beyond the separated instrument (p<0.05). However, calcium hydroxide and electrophoresis alone did not exhibit statistically significant antimicrobial activity (p> 0.05). There was no statistical difference observed between Cupral paste activated by electrophoresis and calcium hydroxide activated by electrophoresis (p> 0.05).

Conclusion: Electrophoresis enhanced medicament penetration and antimicrobial efficiency in the canal blocked by the separated instrument. Cupral paste activated by electrophoresis demonstrated superior performance in all interventions.



Cite this article as: Aminsobhani M, Ketabi MA, Soleimani M, Zareian A, Baharlou B, Azizlou E. Comparing antimicrobial effect of cupral and calcium hydroxide paste with electrophoresis in apical part of root canals blocked by separated instrument. J Iran Dent Assoc. 2022; 34(3-4):76-82.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 6

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 214

Your browser does not support the canvas element.