Submitted: 19 Sep 2024
Accepted: 20 Jan 2023
ePublished: 02 Oct 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Iran Dent Assoc. 2023;35(1): 1-6.
  Abstract View: 24

Original

Microshear bond strength of two types of universal adhesives to primary dentin using self-etch and total-etch techniques

Yasaman Rezvani ORCID logo, Amir Ghasemi ORCID logo, Ayda Bagheri Hariri ORCID logo, Leila Eftekhar* ORCID logo
*Corresponding Author: Email: Leila.eftekhar.a@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of two types of universal adhesives to primary dentin following self-etch (SE) and total-etch (TE) techniques.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 50 extracted sound primary first and second molars were randomly assigned into five groups (n=10). The groups were treated as follows: All Bond Universal (ABU) using the self-etch (SE) technique, Scotchbond Universal (SBU) using the SE technique, ABU using the total-etch (TE) technique, SBU using the TE technique, and Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) as the control group, after exposing the occlusal dentinComposite cylinders were bonded to dentin and underwent µSBS test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha=0.05).
Results: All experimental groups showed significantly lower µSBS than the control group (P<0.05). However, the difference in µSBS was not significant among the experimental groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The results showed higher µSBS of ASB2 (fifth-generation adhesive) than both universal adhesives (SBU and ABU) in SE and TE techniques. The µSBS to primary dentin depended on both adhesive type and technique.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 25

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.